That is a great looking logo. I also think the hole in the couch could be fixed.
Cheers
Garren
> On 14 Jan 2015, at 7:21 AM, Johs Ensby wrote:
>
> Minimizing what is there is a good development
> The hole for the ear plug could be left out, too
> Verbal “Relax” need to be kept with this logo (w
Get your point, Jan
we ship with jQuery, though and as such ar in family with the "jQuery spagetti
community”.
Maybe a gallery with cookbook-style or “how to get started with CouchDB and
XYZ” posts would be the way to go?
johs
> On 13 Jan 2015, at 11:30, Jan Lehnardt wrote:
>
>
>> On 13 Jan
Minimizing what is there is a good development
The hole for the ear plug could be left out, too
Verbal “Relax” need to be kept with this logo (what would else be the meaning
of a couch?)
johs
> On 14 Jan 2015, at 03:49, Alexander Shorin wrote:
>
> Why did you make a hole if couch? That ruins e
Why did you make a hole if couch? That ruins everything ):
--
,,,^..^,,,
On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 2:47 AM, Constantin Angheloiu
wrote:
> I've made a draft proposal of CouchDB logo
>
> https://drive.google.com/file/d/0BwCSb3J9EzV3dDFzbFF0cFgwY0k/view?usp=sharing
>
> witing for feedback
>
> thank y
Great work, I really like it!
-- Nick
On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 4:55 PM, Joan Touzet wrote:
> Wow, I really like it!
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Constantin Angheloiu"
> To: marketing@couchdb.apache.org
> Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2015 6:47:15 PM
> Subject: CouchDB logo proposal
>
Wow, I really like it!
- Original Message -
From: "Constantin Angheloiu"
To: marketing@couchdb.apache.org
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2015 6:47:15 PM
Subject: CouchDB logo proposal
I've made a draft proposal of CouchDB logo
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0BwCSb3J9EzV3dDFzbFF0cFgwY0k/vie
I've made a draft proposal of CouchDB logo
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0BwCSb3J9EzV3dDFzbFF0cFgwY0k/view?usp=sharing
witing for feedback
thank you
--
*C-tin* Angheloiu
*deals with design magic*
mobile: +4 0728.956.111
email: constantin.anghel...@thewizards.ro
find us: www.thewizards.ro
fac
I would prefer a default installation that has as few dependencies as
possible, and use plugins for additional functionality.
Regards!
-- Nick Pavlica
On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 9:57 AM, Alexander Shorin wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 7:44 PM, Akshat Jiwan Sharma
> wrote:
> > Would it be a good
On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 7:44 PM, Akshat Jiwan Sharma
wrote:
> Would it be a good idea to package couchdb together with couchdb lucene?
> When couchdb installs it also fetches and installs couchdb-lucene . Then
> whenever a new database is created in couchdb we add an automatic index-all
> function
Would it be a good idea to package couchdb together with couchdb lucene?
When couchdb installs it also fetches and installs couchdb-lucene . Then
whenever a new database is created in couchdb we add an automatic index-all
function in a design document. We could name this design document
_auto_index
> On 13 Jan 2015, at 10:38 , Johs Ensby wrote:
>
> Not surprising, looking at google trends ew decline.
> That is a pure buzz-index, of course, but what we need to do is to connect it
> to an up-trend for a broad audience.
> CouchDB needs to be if not the sister, so the cousin of nodejs and rea
> On 13 Jan 2015, at 10:44 , Alexander Shorin wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 12:40 PM, Alexander Shorin wrote:
>> On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 12:29 PM, Jan Lehnardt wrote:
On 13 Jan 2015, at 10:21 , Alexander Shorin wrote:
I don't follow what you mean about hiding details. Wha
On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 12:40 PM, Alexander Shorin wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 12:29 PM, Jan Lehnardt wrote:
>>> On 13 Jan 2015, at 10:21 , Alexander Shorin wrote:
>>>
>>> I don't follow what you mean about hiding details. What details? Why to
>>> hide?
>>> The problem with ddocs we have i
On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 12:29 PM, Jan Lehnardt wrote:
>> On 13 Jan 2015, at 10:21 , Alexander Shorin wrote:
>>
>> I don't follow what you mean about hiding details. What details? Why to hide?
>> The problem with ddocs we have is not only documentation, but also
>> lack of tools to works with them
Not surprising, looking at google trends ew decline.
That is a pure buzz-index, of course, but what we need to do is to connect it
to an up-trend for a broad audience.
CouchDB needs to be if not the sister, so the cousin of nodejs and reactjs or
something else that is moving in the right directio
> On 13 Jan 2015, at 10:29 , Jan Lehnardt wrote:
>
>>
>> On 13 Jan 2015, at 10:21 , Alexander Shorin wrote:
>>
>> I don't follow what you mean about hiding details. What details? Why to hide?
>> The problem with ddocs we have is not only documentation, but also
>> lack of tools to works with
> On 13 Jan 2015, at 10:21 , Alexander Shorin wrote:
>
> I don't follow what you mean about hiding details. What details? Why to hide?
> The problem with ddocs we have is not only documentation, but also
> lack of tools to works with them. We admit couchapp thing as a feature
> and ship a tool t
I don't follow what you mean about hiding details. What details? Why to hide?
The problem with ddocs we have is not only documentation, but also
lack of tools to works with them. We admit couchapp thing as a feature
and ship a tool to develop and manage them with easy. Yes, there are a
lot of them
Heya (excuse the HN link),
this is not necessarily something for the weekly news, but I think this is a
useful summary of how people think about CouchDB in the wild. I’m not
suggesting this is representative, but it can help guide us in what we want to
do for our marketing activities, if we are
19 matches
Mail list logo