Re: [libreoffice-marketing] Improving the 'Who are we?' webpage

2014-04-05 Thread Charles-H. Schulz
Hello Robinson, Le Sun, 30 Mar 2014 17:16:11 -0400, Robinson Tryon a écrit : > Hi all, > I've been doing some prep work for LinuxFest NW, and noticed a few > things we might want to update on this page: > https://www.libreoffice.org/about-us/who-are-we/ > > - Because of dual licensing, we shoul

Re: [libreoffice-marketing] Improving the 'Who are we?' webpage

2014-04-05 Thread Robinson Tryon
On Sat, Apr 5, 2014 at 4:13 AM, Charles-H. Schulz wrote: > Hello Robinson, > > Le Sun, 30 Mar 2014 17:16:11 -0400, > Robinson Tryon a écrit : > >> Hi all, >> I've been doing some prep work for LinuxFest NW, and noticed a few >> things we might want to update on this page: >> https://www.libreoffi

Re: [libreoffice-marketing] Improving the 'Who are we?' webpage

2014-04-05 Thread Robinson Tryon
>> Robinson Tryon a écrit : >>> things we might want to update on this page: >>> https://www.libreoffice.org/about-us/who-are-we/ Page is now updated -- thanks, Charles, for pinging me about that :-) Falling squarely in the category "our-work-is-never-done", when I was checking hyperlinks to ens

Re: [libreoffice-marketing] Improving the 'Who are we?' webpage

2014-04-05 Thread Charles-H. Schulz
Hello Robinson, Le Sat, 5 Apr 2014 11:52:30 -0400, Robinson Tryon a écrit : > >> Robinson Tryon a écrit : > >>> things we might want to update on this page: > >>> https://www.libreoffice.org/about-us/who-are-we/ > > Page is now updated -- thanks, Charles, for pinging me about that :-) > > Fal

Re: [libreoffice-marketing] Improving the 'Who are we?' webpage

2014-04-05 Thread Robinson Tryon
On Sat, Apr 5, 2014 at 6:15 PM, Charles-H. Schulz wrote: > Le Sat, 5 Apr 2014 11:52:30 -0400, > Robinson Tryon a écrit : >> Question: is a simple text replacement from "The Community Bylaws" -> >> "The Statues of The Document Foundation" (and a URL update) >> appropriate here? > > Excellent quest