Bjoern,
I agree in part with you, but the need to have these features listed
somewhere not too buried has been identified. That, however does not mean
we should not rethink our website and presentation on community, the
project, etc. I am just trying to break down work items in a way that
Let have both. Features list is usually requested strongly by local groups.
Best,
Charles.
Le 25 oct. 2012 02:04, Bjoern Michaelsen bjoern.michael...@canonical.com
a écrit :
Hi,
walking through the slides at (I didnt see the talk):
http://fsfe.org/news/2012/news-20121022-01.en.html
I
I have been asking for something like this for over a year now.
This type of page will show others what companies, etc., have adopted
LibreOffice. With that information, the local and regional marketers
will be able to refer to a published list of all of the adopters
that are using LO and
On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 08:36:52AM +0200, Charles-H. Schulz wrote:
Let have both. Features list is usually requested strongly by local groups.
Yes, but is that the question that we should ask ourselves when putting
something on the webpage? Or rather: What helps us grow users and esp.
Hi,
walking through the slides at (I didnt see the talk):
http://fsfe.org/news/2012/news-20121022-01.en.html
I have to agree: The adoptors need to be right on the frontpage. Lets instead
kill the section:
https://www.libreoffice.org/features/
(excepting the new in 3.X sections). Those pages
Good Idea,
it can also be called success stories and promoted to a more prominent
location
For e.g.,
someone should be able to search for stories of banking sector adoption,
brazil users adoption and so on.
Dhiren
Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2012 02:03:38 +0200
From: bjoern.michael...@canonical.com