Marc Paré wrote (21-12-12 19:03)
The problem here is where to use LibreOffice to mean both the
community and the product.
I do not know if this is a problem (in any case I did not yet experience
it), but...
I am proposing that a subtle visual aid would
perhaps help in marketing our
Hi,
Le vendredi 21 décembre 2012 à 02:58 -0500, Marc Paré a écrit :
Hi Florian et al,
Le 2012-12-08 06:19, Florian Monfort a écrit :
Can I have the sources from this precise file please?
It's too small to integrate well with the Community logo resolution
standard, I need it bigger
Hello Marc,
Le vendredi 21 décembre 2012 à 09:42 -0500, Marc Paré a écrit :
Le 2012-12-21 06:38, Charles-H. Schulz a écrit :
Can someone point to a rationale about having a logo for the community
that would be different from the logo we use everyday? We have two
logos. One which can
Hi Marc,
How do you suggest users adopt a community?
On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 4:50 PM, Marc Paré m...@marcpare.com wrote:
Le 2012-12-21 10:11, Charles-H. Schulz a écrit :
Hello Marc,
We should also get Italo's opinion on this as well, and, make a note of
the decision so that we do not
Le vendredi 21 décembre 2012 à 10:50 -0500, Marc Paré a écrit :
Le 2012-12-21 10:11, Charles-H. Schulz a écrit :
Hello Marc,
We should also get Italo's opinion on this as well, and, make a note of
the decision so that we do not go over it again.
A lot of the confusion is that the
On 21/12/2012 17:09, Charles-H. Schulz wrote:
Le vendredi 21 décembre 2012 à 10:50 -0500, Marc Paré a écrit :
Le 2012-12-21 10:11, Charles-H. Schulz a écrit :
Hello Marc,
We should also get Italo's opinion on this as well, and, make a note of
the decision so that we do not go over it again.
Le 2012-12-21 11:09, Charles-H. Schulz a écrit :
So we agree on the diagnostic only in part, and disagree on the
remedy ;-) . You are much more optimistic than I am on the brand
recognition. For sure we had tremendous results but the brand
recognition is not where it should be. That's where we
Hello Marc,
Le vendredi 21 décembre 2012 à 12:14 -0500, Marc Paré a écrit :
Le 2012-12-21 11:09, Charles-H. Schulz a écrit :
So we agree on the diagnostic only in part, and disagree on the
remedy ;-) . You are much more optimistic than I am on the brand
recognition. For sure we had
Hi Sophie,
Le 2012-12-21 11:49, Sophie Gautier a écrit :
Beside that, we didn't wait either to market the community, even if much
more should be done. Native language groups have already made huge
efforts to get new contributors at all levels and this has been done
using the same logo, most of
I have been following this discussion and I am still confused.
Why do we need two logos?
Other open source software have no problem with using one logo on their
main site and their community site.
Case in point :
http://www.pentaho.com/
and
http://community.pentaho.com/
use the exact same logo,
Hi Marc,
On 21/12/2012 19:03, Marc Paré wrote:
Hi Sophie,
Le 2012-12-21 11:49, Sophie Gautier a écrit :
Beside that, we didn't wait either to market the community, even if much
more should be done. Native language groups have already made huge
efforts to get new contributors at all levels
Hi Charles,
I'll keep it short as we have most likely argumented this enough to
agree to disagree.
Le 2012-12-21 12:39, Charles-H. Schulz a écrit :
I indeed think that you didn't get the memo (anyone follows the
board-discuss list here?). Marketing has been broken into two
meta-tasks or
Hi Florian et al,
Le 2012-12-08 06:19, Florian Monfort a écrit :
Can I have the sources from this precise file please?
It's too small to integrate well with the Community logo resolution
standard, I need it bigger and with a larger alpha channel
Hi Florian et al,
Le 2012-12-08 07:06, Charles-H. Schulz a écrit :
Hmm, I'm really not so sure I like the new logo. Florian, would you mind
replacing it by our standard logo? Perhaps we can launch a design contest
afterwards.
Thanks,
Charles.
2012/12/8 Florian
Sure :). I'm not against any of that!
--
Florian Monfort
Marketing Apprentice at Red Hat
Marketing Team at The Document Foundation
Student at France Business School
+33 6 58 97 15 61
florian.monf...@gmail.com
On Dec 18, 2012 10:04 AM, Marc Paré m...@marcpare.com wrote:
Hi Florian et al,
Le
Can I have the sources from this precise file please?
It's too small to integrate well with the Community logo resolution
standard, I need it bigger and with a larger alpha channel
http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/File:Libocommunity.png
Thanks!
On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 10:00 PM, Hillar Liiv
Cover photo has been changed for the Google+ page ! :)
On Sat, Dec 8, 2012 at 12:19 PM, Florian Monfort
florian.monf...@gmail.comwrote:
Can I have the sources from this precise file please?
It's too small to integrate well with the Community logo resolution
standard, I need it bigger and
Nope, but I think that brings up a very interesting point : two pages is
maybe too much. I think we should choose between a LibreOffice and a
Document Foundation page. Having both brings confusion.
On Sat, Dec 8, 2012 at 12:43 PM, Hillar Liiv liivhil...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
Is
Hmm, I'm really not so sure I like the new logo. Florian, would you mind
replacing it by our standard logo? Perhaps we can launch a design contest
afterwards.
Thanks,
Charles.
2012/12/8 Florian Monfort florian.monf...@gmail.com
Nope, but I think that brings up a very interesting point : two
Hi Charles,
Even if it's not as good, it is still more relevant for a Community than
the standard logo ;)
Let's launch a contest, but it is important to differenciate the Community
from the official page.
On Sat, Dec 8, 2012 at 1:06 PM, Charles-H. Schulz
charles.sch...@documentfoundation.org
Florian,
I am sorry... but why is it relevant? LibreOffice is the community. There's
no LibreOffice and the community.
Best,
Charles.
2012/12/8 Florian Monfort florian.monf...@gmail.com
Hi Charles,
Even if it's not as good, it is still more relevant for a Community than
the standard logo
On Sat, Dec 8, 2012 at 6:11 AM, Charles-H. Schulz
charles.sch...@documentfoundation.org wrote:
I am sorry... but why is it relevant? LibreOffice is the community. There's
no LibreOffice and the community.
I think he meant the Foundation and the community. These are not the
same, and shouldn't
But why? Isn't the foundation supposed to represent the community? :-)
OK, let's say the Foundation and the community are one thing, and
LibreOffice other thing (the Product). Why should the first thing
share its logo with the latter? :)
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to
23 matches
Mail list logo
