On 1/3/13 3:36 PM, Tom Davies wrote:
> IBM's donation to AOO is heavily dependant on java apparently and
> java ... (errr i'm stuck trying to think of a word that is not rude
> but that adequate).
IBM donation to AOO is pure marketing fluff, as after 18 months the
header of the files is still "IBM
: Marc Paré
>To: marketing@global.libreoffice.org
>Sent: Wednesday, 2 January 2013, 16:02
>Subject: [libreoffice-marketing] Re: CeBIT status quo
>
>Le 2013-01-02 02:33, Florian Effenberger a écrit :
>>> Is the TDF committed to going?
>>
>> We have discussed
Hi,
Marc Paré wrote on 2013-01-02 17:02:
Sorry, I have never been to CeBIT, but it looks like the participants
are mostly devs? Is this right? On their website -- they say in their
"history" notes that they have made the costs of attending prohibitive
with the express expectation that only profe
Hi Marc,
2013/1/2 Marc Paré :
> Le 2013-01-02 02:33, Florian Effenberger a écrit :
>
> Sorry, I have never been to CeBIT, but it looks like the participants are
> mostly devs? Is this right? On their website -- they say in their "history"
> notes that they have made the costs of attending prohibit
Le 2013-01-02 02:33, Florian Effenberger a écrit :
Is the TDF committed to going?
We have discussed it in the board, and we feel that we should go there,
even if it is a bit expensive. However, without people staffing the
booth, it does not make any sense. Based on our previous experience, we
n
Hi Marc,
Marc Paré wrote on 2012-12-29 14:01:
First off, the 2013 CeBIT wiki page is only in DE. But it says that the
distribution of work was going to happen on the DE mailing list.
yes, sorry for that - the page was created in a rush when we had the
first offers for the booth to coordinate
Hi Florian,
Le 2012-12-29 06:38, Florian Effenberger a écrit :
Hello,
here's a status quo on the CeBIT:
- In the wiki at https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/DE/CeBIT2013, there
are still not many volunteers for staffing the booth.
- Costs are rather high this year, the current offer foresees
