On 16/03/15, Joe Brockmeier wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> Question - I'm wondering if folks are likely to be grumpy en masse if I
> include instructions targeted to Mac OS X users for a post on Fedora Magazine?
>
> Context: We're producing two kinds of Vagrant boxes for Fedora 22 Atomic -
> KVM/libvir
On Mon, 2015-03-16 at 12:37 -0400, Ryan Lerch wrote:
> Sorry, one more question -- do people login with openid with:
>
> .id.fedoraproject.org
>
This one.
> or just
>
> id.fedoraproject.org
Is this supposed to work? The wiki page doesn't mention it:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/OpenID
--
On 03/16/2015 03:22 PM, Joe Brockmeier wrote:
Hey all,
Question - I'm wondering if folks are likely to be grumpy en masse if I include
instructions targeted to Mac OS X users for a post on Fedora Magazine?
Context: We're producing two kinds of Vagrant boxes for Fedora 22 Atomic -
KVM/libvirt
> Il giorno 16/mar/2015, alle ore 20:22, Joe Brockmeier ha
> scritto:
> [cut]
> But it feels slightly weird writing a howto that includes Mac instructions
> for Fedora Magazine. Thoughts? Hope I'm just being over-sensitive.
IMO there's no problem.
As ambassador I would love when I can say we
You are going to get pushback but I think that since pretty much all the
people I am helping on weekends with Vagrant are MacOSX users.. that it
needs to be done.
On 16 March 2015 at 13:22, Joe Brockmeier wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> Question - I'm wondering if folks are likely to be grumpy en masse if
Hey all,
Question - I'm wondering if folks are likely to be grumpy en masse if I include
instructions targeted to Mac OS X users for a post on Fedora Magazine?
Context: We're producing two kinds of Vagrant boxes for Fedora 22 Atomic -
KVM/libvirt and VirtualBox. The VirtualBox images are most
On 03/13/2015 02:22 PM, Paul W. Frields wrote:
On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 03:20:31PM -0400, Ryan Lerch wrote:
On 03/12/2015 02:57 PM, Gabriele Trombini wrote:
Il giorno 12/mar/2015, alle ore 19:42, Chaoyi Zha
mailto:cydrob...@fedoraproject.org>> ha
scritto:
FAS openid
On Thu, Mar 12, 2015, 2:
Following up on this thread--they did accept the feedback and were responsive.
This morning I got the following message:
The SPP disable of SSL v3, originally scheduled for this week, has been
postponed to March 23rd due to significant negative impacts for some of our
customers. We need to all
