Re: Use of Link shorteners on Twitter

2015-11-15 Thread Lord Drachenblut
I believe that would be Brian Proffitt who does. On Tue, Nov 10, 2015, 8:44 PM Justin W. Flory wrote: > On 11/10/2015 08:33 PM, Lord Drachenblut wrote: > > There is one reason for using ow.ly URL shortener and > > that is it allows the person posting via

Re: Use of Link shorteners on Twitter

2015-11-13 Thread Brian Proffitt
On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 9:11 PM, Patrick Uiterwijk wrote: > > With this in mind, personally, I feel like link shorteners are not > > necessary then. If we can get the stats, I personally think it's not a > > bad idea to avoid them. > > > > Two small remarks: > 1. I am

Re: Use of Link shorteners on Twitter

2015-11-13 Thread Brian Proffitt
On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 8:44 PM, Justin W. Flory wrote: > On 11/10/2015 08:33 PM, Lord Drachenblut wrote: > >> There is one reason for using ow.ly URL shortener and >> that is it allows the person posting via hootsuite to track engagement >> with a post. I

Re: Use of Link shorteners on Twitter

2015-11-13 Thread Brian Proffitt
On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 7:54 AM, Ryan Lerch wrote: > On 11/13/2015 10:05 PM, Brian Proffitt wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 8:44 PM, Justin W. Flory < > jflo...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On 11/10/2015 08:33 PM, Lord Drachenblut wrote: >> >>> There is one

Re: Use of Link shorteners on Twitter

2015-11-13 Thread Ryan Lerch
On 11/13/2015 10:05 PM, Brian Proffitt wrote: On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 8:44 PM, Justin W. Flory > wrote: On 11/10/2015 08:33 PM, Lord Drachenblut wrote: There is one reason for using ow.ly URL

Re: Use of Link shorteners on Twitter

2015-11-11 Thread Jiri Eischmann
Ryan Lerch píše v St 11. 11. 2015 v 10:01 +1000: > Hi all, > > Just wondering what people think about not using any link shorteners > on > the official Fedora twitter feed. Twitter actually passes all links > in > tweets through their own t.co/ link shortener, so using another one > is > just

Use of Link shorteners on Twitter

2015-11-10 Thread Ryan Lerch
Hi all, Just wondering what people think about not using any link shorteners on the official Fedora twitter feed. Twitter actually passes all links in tweets through their own t.co/ link shortener, so using another one is just (IMHO) unnecessarily obfuscating the link from our followers on

Re: Use of Link shorteners on Twitter

2015-11-10 Thread Chaoyi Zha
Yes, I'm aware that it is passed through t.co. If it counts the links as the same amount of characters, we might still want to keep the shortened URLs for aesthetics, as long links don't look very good on mobile. Unless you have a specific objection to using a shortener, I'm assuming. On Tue,

Re: Use of Link shorteners on Twitter

2015-11-10 Thread Lord Drachenblut
There is one reason for using ow.ly URL shortener and that is it allows the person posting via hootsuite to track engagement with a post. I would rather see a URL shortener that is fedora branded being used if possible. On Tue, Nov 10, 2015, 8:02 PM Ryan Lerch wrote: > On

Re: Use of Link shorteners on Twitter

2015-11-10 Thread Patrick Uiterwijk
Hi all, > On 11/10/2015 08:33 PM, Lord Drachenblut wrote: > > There is one reason for using ow.ly URL shortener and > > that is it allows the person posting via hootsuite to track engagement > > with a post. I would rather see a URL shortener that is fedora branded > > being used

Re: Use of Link shorteners on Twitter

2015-11-10 Thread Justin W. Flory
On 11/10/2015 08:58 PM, Patrick Uiterwijk wrote: Hi all, On 11/10/2015 08:33 PM, Lord Drachenblut wrote: There is one reason for using ow.ly URL shortener and that is it allows the person posting via hootsuite to track engagement with a post. I would rather see a URL shortener

Re: Use of Link shorteners on Twitter

2015-11-10 Thread Patrick Uiterwijk
> With this in mind, personally, I feel like link shorteners are not > necessary then. If we can get the stats, I personally think it's not a > bad idea to avoid them. > Two small remarks: 1. I am personally also in favor of using t.co instead of another shortener for security reasons

Re: Use of Link shorteners on Twitter

2015-11-10 Thread Ryan Lerch
On 11/11/2015 10:53 AM, Chaoyi Zha wrote: Yes, I'm aware that it is passed through t.co . If it counts the links as the same amount of characters, we might still want to keep the shortened URLs for aesthetics, as long links don't look very good on mobile. IMHO, a full link

Re: Use of Link shorteners on Twitter

2015-11-10 Thread Ryan Lerch
On 11/11/2015 10:03 AM, Chaoyi Zha wrote: Hi Ryan, I think the use of a link shortener is adequate for Twitter. This is because they have a character limit, and using a shortener greatly helps increase the amount of text you can have in a tweet. Twitter counts your link's characters even

Re: Use of Link shorteners on Twitter

2015-11-10 Thread Justin W. Flory
On 11/10/2015 08:33 PM, Lord Drachenblut wrote: There is one reason for using ow.ly URL shortener and that is it allows the person posting via hootsuite to track engagement with a post. I would rather see a URL shortener that is fedora branded being used if possible. This was

Re: Use of Link shorteners on Twitter

2015-11-10 Thread Ryan Lerch
On 11/11/2015 11:58 AM, Patrick Uiterwijk wrote: Hi all, On 11/10/2015 08:33 PM, Lord Drachenblut wrote: There is one reason for using ow.ly URL shortener and that is it allows the person posting via hootsuite to track engagement with a post. I would rather see a URL shortener

Re: Use of Link shorteners on Twitter

2015-11-10 Thread Chaoyi Zha
Hi Ryan, I think the use of a link shortener is adequate for Twitter. This is because they have a character limit, and using a shortener greatly helps increase the amount of text you can have in a tweet. Twitter counts your link's characters even though it passes it through its own link gateway.

Re: Use of Link shorteners on Twitter

2015-11-10 Thread Ryan Lerch
On 11/11/2015 12:11 PM, Patrick Uiterwijk wrote: With this in mind, personally, I feel like link shorteners are not necessary then. If we can get the stats, I personally think it's not a bad idea to avoid them. Two small remarks: 1. I am personally also in favor of using t.co instead of