Nevermind. I re-read the logo guidelines.
Here's our current usage:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/curiouslee/3911738030/
Mike
On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 10:14 PM, Mike Lee wrote:
> Recently, we've been producing more printed materials mentioning Sugar Labs
> DC such as flyers and a poster. For e
Recently, we've been producing more printed materials mentioning Sugar Labs
DC such as flyers and a poster. For example for the OLPC Community Book
Sprint poster:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/curiouslee/3866553822/in/set-72157622056452421/
I used the Sugar Labs logo and annotated in text below th
I've been watching this thread since it began and understand that from
a marketing perspective numbers are 'ugly'.
On the other hand, everyone seems to acknowledge that numbers make it
easier to track things from a development and
deployment support perspective. Obviously, that works best if the
On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 05:30:30PM +0200, Sean DALY wrote:
> re marketing course: in fact I have accepted Mel's invitation to do a
> classroom for Fedora.
Congratulations.
> re logos: Strawberry=6, Blueberry=4, and 5 we'll use some other time
Very clear - thanks.
> [Have we agreed on Blueberry
Hi Bernie
Walter had sent me a heads-up about this one.
Professor Negroponte responded in a comment
(http://www.undispatch.com/node/8867) which an editor reprinted.
I'm not seeing comments under the story - were they removed?
This piece is entirely from secondary sources - all she did was read
