On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 08:20:43PM -0400, Bill Bogstad wrote:
> I've been watching this thread since it began and understand that from
> a marketing perspective numbers are 'ugly'.
Numbers are for the developers, ice cream flavours are for the press /
GUI users, as I understand it.
> On the other
On Sun, Sep 13, 2009 at 11:18:55PM +0200, Sean DALY wrote:
> Bill - I completely agree our numbering systems are byzantine and
> difficult to grasp... there is the Sugar version number, the Fedora
> version number, the OLPC-OS version number and the XO build number.
The numbering is for developers
Bill - I completely agree our numbering systems are byzantine and
difficult to grasp... there is the Sugar version number, the Fedora
version number, the OLPC-OS version number and the XO build number.
Our marketing strategy is to push Sugar on a Stick, so to simplify
that we picked the next relea
Great thanks Gary!
Sean
On Sat, Sep 12, 2009 at 11:12 PM, Gary C Martin wrote:
> On 12 Sep 2009, at 21:40, Sebastian Dziallas wrote:
>
>> Martin Dengler wrote:
>>>
>>> On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 05:30:30PM +0200, Sean DALY wrote:
re marketing course: in fact I have accepted Mel's invitat
