On 20 May 2013 12:19, Bastien wrote:
> Sean DALY writes:
>
> > I feel that 0.100 is even more unmarketable than 0.98.
>
> Agreed. Mathematically, it reads like a regression. Instead of
> reaching some definite level of maturity, it gives the signal that
> Sugar is in its early alpha (which is
Sean DALY writes:
> I feel that 0.100 is even more unmarketable than 0.98.
Agreed. Mathematically, it reads like a regression. Instead of
reaching some definite level of maturity, it gives the signal that
Sugar is in its early alpha (which is clearly wrong IMHO.)
--
Bastien
