I've reviewed the pull request:
https://github.com/walterbender/www-sugarlabs/pull/9
Perhaps you should take parts of Sam's pull request, the parts
that improve page loading time. If you can identify them.
It is unfortunate that Sam's pull request didn't split the style
changes from the page lo
Okay, I hear what you're saying ... but you have to have a good reason
than wanting to go a bit more innovative; it's not your desires that
matter, it's the good outcomes for Sugar Labs that matters.
And acceptance of a PR is up to the maintainer. Which isn't me,
thankfully.
On Sat, Feb 28, 2015
Yeah, but his concept of UI is radical different than ours. We want to go
bit more innovative. I dont have anything against PRs, but I think that's
one created by him shouldn't be merged before our works finish.
On Sat 28 Feb 2015 at 01:27 James Cameron wrote:
> I do not see it as separate, I see
I do not see it as separate, I see it as a useful contest of ideas.
That's what pull requests are for.
In this case, it has provided a substantial load and render benefit.
On Sat, Feb 28, 2015 at 12:23:50AM +, Tymon Radzik wrote:
> I think Sam shouldnt work on separate project, rather help us
I think Sam shouldnt work on separate project, rather help us in improving
exisiting one. And disscuis so radicial UI changes with us...
On Sat 28 Feb 2015 at 01:22 James Cameron wrote:
> Yes, that version loads faster.
>
> 15.855 seconds for load and render.
>
> 2.824 seconds for render only.
>
Yes, that version loads faster.
15.855 seconds for load and render.
2.824 seconds for render only.
But on your version, the video embedding element "Google Code-In |
Promotional video on Sugar" is beyond the visible area, only the
sugarlabs title on black background is visible.
Scrolling down b
Unfortunately I can check only mobile view now, I will give you opinion
tomorrow. Have a nice night!
On Sat 28 Feb 2015 at 01:08 Tymon Radzik wrote:
> I use FitText to make text being more responsive and stretch it in width
> div. I use also some additional jQuery code to take care about logos an
I use FitText to make text being more responsive and stretch it in width
div. I use also some additional jQuery code to take care about logos and
website colors. I will take a look on your PR in a second.
On Sat 28 Feb 2015 at 01:06 Sam P. wrote:
> Beside a gallery, what features is my version mi
Beside a gallery, what features is my version missing? "My version" is
100% based off "yours", see the pull request I sent.
On Sat, 28 Feb 2015 11:05 am Tymon Radzik wrote:
> I can use more if you want Sam ;). Seriously - all libraries I use are
> needed for website. Your website doesn't requir
I can use more if you want Sam ;). Seriously - all libraries I use are
needed for website. Your website doesn't require features like my one. We
should rather take care about optimization in loading them, not on just
telling "oh this is so slow..."
Good night :-)
On Sat 28 Feb 2015 at 01:02 Sam P.
I think the load speed is caused by Tymon's site using basically every
JavaScript and css library that has ever been published. Does this version
load faster @Quozl? https://activities-2.sugarlabs.org/www-sugarlabs/
On Sat, 28 Feb 2015 10:30 am James Cameron wrote:
> Same test XO-1 laptop, sam
Same test XO-1 laptop, same URLs, without clearing cache.
http://sugarlabs.org/~tymon/ ... load and render 35.343 seconds,
(previously 31 seconds),
http://sugarlabs.org/ ... load and render 6.064 seconds, (previously
5 seconds),
http://sugarlabs.org/~tymon/ ... render only, 14.080 seconds,
(prev
Hello,
Thank you all for your opinions. We'll try to consider/implement them.
James Cameron - thank you for your data, they were useful. We've hade
significant changes to page's layout and performance. Please check it now.
We've done some tests and page loads not longer than 3 seconds. UI is more
From: samsongo...@hotmail.com
To: qu...@laptop.org
Subject: RE: [Sugar-devel] SugarLabs.org new website - looking for
opinions/ideas!
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2015 12:20:15 +0100
Hello, I have a little addition to this website, But i am not a web designer
but the "Activity Section" is suppose to c
14 matches
Mail list logo
