On 20 May 2013 12:19, Bastien wrote:
> Sean DALY writes:
>
> > I feel that 0.100 is even more unmarketable than 0.98.
>
> Agreed. Mathematically, it reads like a regression. Instead of
> reaching some definite level of maturity, it gives the signal that
> Sugar is in its early alpha (which is
Sean DALY writes:
> I feel that 0.100 is even more unmarketable than 0.98.
Agreed. Mathematically, it reads like a regression. Instead of
reaching some definite level of maturity, it gives the signal that
Sugar is in its early alpha (which is clearly wrong IMHO.)
--
Bastien
"Better" and "Perfect" are the enemies of "What Is Needed"
>
> From: Walter Bender
>To: Daniel Narvaez ; Sean DALY
>Cc: Sugar Labs Marketing ;
>"sugar-de...@lists.sugarlabs.org" ; iaep
>
>Sent: Friday, May 17, 2013 6:21 AM
>Subject: Re: [IAEP] [Marketing] Su
Hi,
On Fri, May 17 2013, Daniel Narvaez wrote:
> we need to decide if we want the next release to be 1.0 or 0.100.
1.0! It's crazy that we have a project used by millions of people
that's still pre-1.0 seven years later. And the extra press from
calling it 1.0 will be useful to direct people to
