> This would include things like:
>
> - email addresses
> - whether they've opted in to receive GNOME updates
> - when available, snail mail addresses
> - contribution history
> - event attendance history
All this can be done with Drupal/CivicSpace. The CRM module [1] pointed
by Luis is run
Here is the first "official" design for our GNOME Members' address card.
http://live.gnome.org/GnomeMemberCard
Thanks to James Bowes for the Inkscape work.
Feel free to suggest new designs (under a free license please) or to use
the GNOME Member logo on your own designs. I guess that we'll update
On Wed, 2005-07-13 at 14:52 +0300, Mohammad DAMT wrote:
> On Rab, 2005-07-13 at 12:13 +0200, Murray Cumming wrote:
> > Here is the first "official" design for our GNOME Members' address card.
> > http://live.gnome.org/GnomeMemberCard
>
> Are we going to have something (banners?) like this to put i
Hi,
Selon Philip Van Hoof <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Wed, 2005-07-13 at 12:13 +0200, Murray Cumming wrote:
> > Please remember, this is not a commercial business card. We can't allow
> > people to use the trademarked GNOME logo on their business cards without
> > explicit permission from the GNOME
On Wed, 2005-07-13 at 11:10 +0700, Ross Golder wrote:
> I haven't followed that discussion (GNOME-About). However, I am aware of
> a requirement for a system to get the list of Foundation members into a
> database. I must've either confused it with, or missed some seperate
> requirement for gettin
On Wed, 2005-07-13 at 09:22 +0200, Quim Gil wrote:
> > This would include things like:
> >
> > - email addresses
> > - whether they've opted in to receive GNOME updates
> > - when available, snail mail addresses
> > - contribution history
> > - event attendance history
>
> All this can be do
> Were [1] and [2] supposed to be pointing somewhere?
Ooops!
[1] http://objectledge.org/confluence/display/CRM/CRM+Project+One+Pager
[2] http://drupal.org/node/15109
I'm not going to postulate more for Drupal. I only wanted to say that
between Drupal and zero, Drupal seems to be a better sta
On 7/13/05, Owen Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm not really sure how it would handle event attendance .. maybe
> that somehow fits into the "activity log".
It is in their feature list, but I admit I haven't looked into that
aspect at all.
> Then there is the question of whether the found
> [ It doesn't look like the CivicCRM relationship to the rest of
> Drupal is strong ... basically Drupal seems to just be used
> as the user database.
It's built on top of the framework as plugins, so it could be separated
logically, but it'd include a bunch of Drupal anyway. Organisationa
On Thu, 2005-07-14 at 07:03 +1000, Jeff Waugh wrote:
>
>
> > [ It doesn't look like the CivicCRM relationship to the rest of
> > Drupal is strong ... basically Drupal seems to just be used
> > as the user database.
>
> It's built on top of the framework as plugins, so it could be separated
On 7/13/05, Owen Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 2005-07-14 at 07:03 +1000, Jeff Waugh wrote:
> >
> >
> > > [ It doesn't look like the CivicCRM relationship to the rest of
> > > Drupal is strong ... basically Drupal seems to just be used
> > > as the user database.
> >
> > It's bui
The previous was a bit of mess, didn't notice that in gedit. :\
Here's a better one.
-Arangel
âGUADECâ 2006 ÐÐÐÐÐÐÐ ÐÐ ÐÐРСÐÐÐÐÐ
7-Ñа годиÑна коÑиÑниÑка и ÑазвиваÑка
ÐвÑопÑка конÑеÑенÑиÑа за Ðном (GUADEC) во
âGUADECâ 2006 ÐÐÐÐÐÐÐ ÐÐ ÐÐРСÐÐÐÐÐ
7-Ñа годиÑна коÑиÑниÑка и ÑазвиваÑка
ÐвÑопÑка конÑеÑенÑиÑа за Ðном (GUADEC) во
ÐаÑÑелона ке пÑивлеÑе коÑиÑниÑи од облаÑÑа
на бизниÑ
[I hate to do this, but:
(1) can someone summarize the open/conflicting issues here, and
perhaps also the resolved ones, if there are any? I just finally
caught up on the wiki page, and thought there was more consensus than
this thread would seem to suggest.
(2) can we have a meeting in yarrr.gno
On Wed, 2005-07-13 at 13:15 +1000, Jeff Waugh wrote:
> > It all started with trying to find a way to estimate the number of GNOME
> > users. An automated ping is the best way, but is ethically dangerous. An
> > opt-in register is ethically fine, but sub-optimal for our purposes.
> > Also, we can
On Wed, 2005-07-13 at 22:03 -0400, Luis Villa wrote:
> (2) can we have a meeting in yarrr.gnome.org[1], perhaps weekly[2],
> and perhaps restricted in attendance, until we hash some of this out,
> at least at a high level?
I think this is a great idea. Just tell me a time, and I will be there,
wh
16 matches
Mail list logo
