I think it's best we just let this pass and get back to business. :-)
No need to continue to drag this through the mud. Rather, this is our
opportunity to:
a) go through osnews/slashdot looking for decent feedback
b) get a feel of what people think about GNOME both good and bad.
and other things
Santiago Roza wrote:
> oh god...
> http://linux.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/12/13/1340215
Well the thread is slowly reaching troll stages on
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and GNOMEUsability - so perhaps it would
worthwhile to figure out what exactly Linus is getting at.
And on second thoughts why not blog
Hi,
On 12/14/05, Santiago Roza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > As jdub would roughly put it "Don't Panic".
>
> well i never said we should panic, but it's something we should be
> keeping an eye on.
I don't see a reason to Panic.
This flamewar has been going on for ages and will never end.
So yes,
> As jdub would roughly put it "Don't Panic".
well i never said we should panic, but it's something we should be
keeping an eye on.
--
Santiago Roza
Departamento I+D - Thymbra
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
marketing-list mailing list
marketing-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/marketi
As jdub would roughly put it "Don't Panic".
Jerome Gotangco
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mobile: +639196555242
GPG: 0xA97B69A0
--
marketing-list mailing list
marketing-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/marketing-list
> We need to thank him for generating so much press. That should raise our
> profile in many trade rags. We need to tell the press people we are open
> for
> interviews and what not so that we can give people a balanced view. ;)
Good idea. I've mentioned that on my blog, so it appears on
planet
An, 2005 12 13 13:29 -0500, Rajiv Vyas rašė:
> Very strong opinion from an extremely smart and influential guy.
Very smart and influential yes, intelligent no, YOU FUCKIN IDIOTS.
Considering his mails should we market GNOME as 'intelligent' instead of
'usable'? :) It sounds cool and raises a quest
We need to thank him for generating so much press. That should raise our
profile in many trade rags. We need to tell the press people we are open for
interviews and what not so that we can give people a balanced view. ;)
sri
On Tue, Dec 13, 2005 at 01:29:49PM -0500, Rajiv Vyas wrote:
> Very s
Very strong opinion from an extremely smart and influential guy.
On 12/13/05, Santiago Roza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> oh god...
> http://linux.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/12/13/1340215
>
>
> --
> Santiago Roza
> Departamento I+D - Thymbra
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> --
> marketing-list mailing lis
oh god...
http://linux.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/12/13/1340215
--
Santiago Roza
Departamento I+D - Thymbra
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
marketing-list mailing list
marketing-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/marketing-list
On Tue, 13 Dec 2005 13:04:46 +
Alex Hudson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[snip]
>
> Also, I know people have banged on about gnome.org a few times, but
> hiding the LiveCD in the download area is a shame. We should have some
> kind of 'Take a test drive' pretty prominently on the front page, if
On Tue, 2005-12-13 at 13:45 +0100, Murray Cumming wrote:
> > On Tue, 2005-12-13 at 11:31 +0100, Murray Cumming wrote:
> >> I would prefer to just link to LiveCDs for the distributions, but
> >> 1) They don't provide these at the right time.
> >> 2) They don't all provide them.
> >> 3) They are not
> On Tue, 2005-12-13 at 11:31 +0100, Murray Cumming wrote:
>> I would prefer to just link to LiveCDs for the distributions, but
>> 1) They don't provide these at the right time.
>> 2) They don't all provide them.
>> 3) They are not all a good user experience.
>
> Didn't Luis start an ubuntu-offsho
> On Tue, 2005-12-13 at 11:31 +0100, Murray Cumming wrote:
> > I would prefer to just link to LiveCDs for the distributions, but
> > 1) They don't provide these at the right time.
> > 2) They don't all provide them.
> > 3) They are not all a good user experience.
>
> Didn't Luis start an ubuntu-
On Tue, 2005-12-13 at 11:31 +0100, Murray Cumming wrote:
> I would prefer to just link to LiveCDs for the distributions, but
> 1) They don't provide these at the right time.
> 2) They don't all provide them.
> 3) They are not all a good user experience.
Didn't Luis start an ubuntu-offshoot "pure"
On Mon, 2005-12-12 at 21:55 -0300, Santiago Roza wrote:
> > It's GNOME plus what GNOME needs to run. We do reverse major Ubuntu
> > changes such as browse-mode-as-default and Firefox-instead-of-epiphany,
> > and the theme, so it's a pretty pure GNOME experience.
>
> but what's the point of offerin
On Mon, 2005-12-12 at 22:12 -0300, Santiago Roza wrote:
> > Most of the stuff at the end of this list is outlying stuff that does
> > not belong in any overview.
>
> and that's why i put that in the end and labeled it "not so common
> and/or relevant" :)
To encourage people to read it, just remo
>
>
>> It would be harmless to change it to "Gnome" if the marketing team
>> decided
>> that this is a good idea.
>
> Except that a large proportion of the project would like it to remain the
> way it is. We've gone over this before, numerous times.
OK. Then I misjudged the general opinion.
Mur
> It would be harmless to change it to "Gnome" if the marketing team decided
> that this is a good idea.
Except that a large proportion of the project would like it to remain the
way it is. We've gone over this before, numerous times.
- Jeff
--
linux.conf.au 2006: Dunedin, New Zealand
> On Mon, 2005-12-12 at 16:47 +0100, Murray Cumming wrote:
>
>> > What is GNOME? We seem to fond of asking that question these days.
>> The
>> > answer is simple: it is the GNU Network Object Model Environment.
>>
>> That is never ever the answer, and hasn't been for a long time. If it's
>> anywh
20 matches
Mail list logo
