Guilherme de S. Pastore wrote:
> we are in the process of assembling a local group in Brazil, whose job
> would be generally representing GNOME in the country, gathering users,
> guiding potential developers, etc.
Normally (and I don't know if this is written down someplace) the
country codes viz.
i certainly don't have any experience on issues like this one, but if
you're interested in random opinions, i think gnome brasil sounds much
better and more... "human" than gnome-br, which is a little geeky,
weird to pronounce, and not really suited for general audiences imho.
on the other hand,
Hello all,
we are in the process of assembling a local group in Brazil, whose job
would be generally representing GNOME in the country, gathering users,
guiding potential developers, etc.
We were thinking about our names and got a doubt... "GNOME-BR" or "GNOME
Brasil"? We do not really have stron
Dear All,
I started a community map at
http://www.frappr.com/gnomedev
for the people that contribute to the GNOME platform!
Therefore, if you are involved in any aspect of GNOME development,
please join in! For example, this includes people involved in coding,
translating,
marketing, porting,
Hi All,
OOo has created a community page for their developers at Frappr
(http://www.frappr.com),
http://www.frappr.com/ooodev
They already have over 40 members registered and it looks really good.
I know that there is already a GNOME map at
http://live.gnome.org/GnomeWorldWide
However, it is u
> What brings us to the point of... continuing the personas project, which
> is really interesing and something really new and constructive in our
> discussions.
that's #1 in my [gnome] to-do list, believe me. i'm sure there will
be progress real soon, and i'll post here whatever i have (as soon
En/na Santiago Roza ha escrit:
> yes effective advocacy requires knowing your target markets, but
> that's a prerequisite for advocacy, not advocacy itself. so if we're
> gonna do that in addition to just advocacy, well it won't be just
> advocacy.
What brings us to the point of... continuing
Hi,
Fernando San Martín Woerner wrote:
El sáb, 17-12-2005 a las 00:53 +1100, Jeff Waugh escribió:
I'm really disappointed that Quim and German aren't on, but everyone who
stood this year was rad in one way or another, so I'm again disappointed
that we've reduced the number of directors.
that
> You are welcome to disagree (and
> reduce your motivation to help out), but then we're just playing semantics,
> and not getting on with the job.
i wasn't trying to play semantics, just explaining why i had gotten you wrong.
--
Santiago Roza
Departamento I+D - Thymbra
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
mar
El sáb, 17-12-2005 a las 00:53 +1100, Jeff Waugh escribió:
>
>
> > > That was just a little off-topic public gripe. There are people who I
> > > would have liked to see on the Board who didn't get on. ;-)
> >
> > oh now i see. care to share those names at least in private? ;)
>
> I'm really d
> > That was just a little off-topic public gripe. There are people who I
> > would have liked to see on the Board who didn't get on. ;-)
>
> oh now i see. care to share those names at least in private? ;)
I'm really disappointed that Quim and German aren't on, but everyone who
stood this yea
> That was just a little off-topic public gripe. There are people who I would
> have liked to see on the Board who didn't get on. ;-)
oh now i see. care to share those names at least in private? ;)
> Developers are not really all that relevant to this
> discussion, their time is better spent
> > I dunno - with old board members, new board members, and people who
> > should have been elected (!!!)
>
> i don't understand what you mean by "should have been elected"; could you
> please explain?
That was just a little off-topic public gripe. There are people who I would
have liked to se
> I dunno - with old board members, new board members, and people who should
> have been elected (!!!)
i don't understand what you mean by "should have been elected"; could
you please explain?
> (at least in Foundation terms, as opposed to developer terms - but I think
> that's entirely sensibl
On Fri, 2005-12-16 at 02:57 -0300, Santiago Roza wrote:
> it's not my fault if gnome's developers don't give a f*ck about public
> relations, external communication, marketing, and pretty much
> everything other than coding.
>
> but... if developers cared to consider the marketing team as somethin
On Fri, 2005-12-16 at 16:35 +1100, Jeff Waugh wrote:
>
>
> > well, it's marketing (or to be exact, public relations) 101... you (as an
> > organization) don't just shut up when someone trashes your image.
> >
> > go write a high-profile article trashing coca-cola or intel or whatever
> > big bra
On Fri, 2005-12-16 at 01:14 -0300, Santiago Roza wrote:
> > You're certainly welcome to send whatever response you want, but I'd
> > suggest that there are many better things to do than respond directly
> > to Linus.
>
>
> cool then; message acknowledged. i now understand that we're a
> marketin
On Fri, 2005-12-16 at 09:35 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> I said we should be going through the common criticisms and
> *communicating* the decisions behind them. See I said it again ;-)
By the way, we generally try to do this in the release notes,
particularly when we imagine that people might
Hi Santiago,
Santiago Roza wrote:
i meant "we" the marketing team; dude i don't consider myself a gnome hacker :)
Everyone involved with GNOME is in the marketing team. Kathy Sierra
wrote at lenght about this:
http://headrush.typepad.com/creating_passionate_users/2005/08/you_are_a_marke.ht
> and i didn't know that not because i didn't care, but because there's not
> much communication going on between this list and the people who makes the
> actual decisions about gnome.
I dunno - with old board members, new board members, and people who should
have been elected (!!!) helping out
> Dude - Chris, Nat, Havoc and I each politely disagreed with his message, in
> the appropriate forum.
yeah well i wasn't meaning that particular "we"; of course nat or
havoc or you or chris don't fear linux.
i meant "we" the marketing team; dude i don't consider myself a gnome hacker :)
> Th
21 matches
Mail list logo
