On Thu, 2005-12-22 at 01:29 +, Simos Xenitellis wrote:
> Thanks for the update at
>
> http://live.gnome.org/LogoGuidelines
>
>
> Therefore, can we say that
> "a GNOME user-group, provided they accepted the user-group licensing
> agreement, has two options:
> 1. Use the official logo provid
On Wed, 2005-12-21 at 04:31 -0500, Jason Ronda wrote:
> Ok, we all know about Google but since this is a marketing list I just
> wanted to make sure if we were in a position to try to push the idea
> and ask our user base to get including GNOME related stuff in their
> own P2P shared files.
> Wha
I also think it's a good idea. Add the .exe GNOME applications
available, all the marketing materials we have
Also BitTorrent links help, they are increasingly used in the
activist/artist/creatove/unconformist environments, where free software
is increasignly understood and arising expectation
I think it great idea.
A cool Naming convention would be,
gnome-all-2.14-solaris10-x86.tar.bz2 ???
Yes I can just imagine a evolution-2.4-keygen.exe, appearing.
:)
Karl
On Thu, 2005-12-22 at 02:51 -0700, Gezim Hoxha wrote:
> On Wed, 2005-12-21 at 04:31 -0500, Jason Ronda wrote:
>
> > Ok, we al
People interested in making the gnome.org website more consistant to our
marketing and project goals, please join the discussion in gnome-web-list:
Signing off the wgo goals
http://mail.gnome.org/archives/gnome-web-list/2005-December/msg00095.html
and specially to marketing-friendly gnomers:
Re:
I would prefer if we just work on that problem. I have documented some
stuff. Personally I think the feedback of Till is much more
constructive. I had created a wiki page in October, because I also
think that printing is an important topic that needs to be fixed:
http://live.gnome.org/GnomePrintin
hmm i don't think it's a good idea.
bittorrent? ok many free software projects are using it, so its image
is 50% legal 50% warez (+mp3 +divx +pr0n).
but the other networks are 99% about warez... do we really want to be
associated with that?
... not to mention the fact that we can't control what
On Thu, 2005-12-22 at 10:07 -0300, Santiago Roza wrote:
> ... not to mention the fact that we can't control what goes into emule
> or gnutella, so anyone could upload "naughty schoolgirls 4" and rename
> it to gnome-something.
You're forgetting the fact that I can upload "naughty schoolgirls 4" a
> You're forgetting the fact that I can upload "naughty schoolgirls 4" and
> rename it to "gnome-something" and no one can stop me.
no i'm not forgetting it, i'm just acknowledging the fact that it
seems like nobody has thought of that yet. and i don't feel like
encouraging them.
anyway, now th
On Thu, 2005-12-22 at 17:44 -0300, Santiago Roza wrote:
> when they upload stuff to p2p networks, people like to "help" by
> compressing stuff with .rar (and adding a password so they have to
> visit their site), adding incorrect readmes, uploading experimental
> alphas, and in general messing eve
> However, if we put legitimate gnome content, you
> think that will encourage shady gnome content to get uploaded as well?
if we put legitimate gnome content once, that will encourage people to
"help" and make their own "special" versions (compressed with rar with
their very own password and some
Mmmm... we are simply talking about recommending in a paragraph of a
spread-gnome page somewhere in gnome.org that users of P2P networks have
GNOME related files in their shared folders, isn't it? I mean, no big
campaign. No big deal, but a useful tip.
In the kiosks you can buy porn and lots of no
12 matches
Mail list logo
