Danilo and Murray have made clear at
http://live.gnome.org/GnomeWeb/CmsRequirements that PO files and
revision control for translations is a must. This helps approaching the
right CMS since it is not a feature not ready out of the box.
I've sent those questions to the developers / people that subm
Gergely Nagy wrote:
> Do I mean the current system for managing content? Yes :)
>
> On Tue, 2006-07-25 at 01:32 +0200, Quim Gil wrote:
>> wgo is currently maintained via CVS/SVN editing the pages directly. No
>> CMS involved. Do you mean checking the requirements against the current
>> system?
No
Hi,
On Thu, 20 Jul 2006 17:11:44 +0100 (BST)
Paul Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> At the risk provoking a further rant, I suggest having a look at the
> latest SuitWatch from Doc Searls,
>
> http://lists.ssc.com/pipermail/suitwatch/attachments/20060720/b35fd219/attachment.cc
>
> wherein
Hi Claus,
Claus Schwarm wrote:
> If Doc Searls' thesis about the viability of traditional marketing is
> correct, why are OSS projects that care about this traditional
> marketing more successful than those who not?
I think you have the cart and the horse in the wrong order there.
What has h
On Tue, 2006-07-25 at 15:29 +0200, Murray Cumming wrote:
> > Hi Murray;
> >
> > There's a possibility that we might have a GNOME Booth at CEBIT Eurasia,
> > and we might need GNOME Event Box for that event.
> >
> > Expo is 5 days long, and it's possible that we will there for 5 days.
> > Expo start
> On Tue, 2006-07-25 at 15:29 +0200, Murray Cumming wrote:
>> > Hi Murray;
>> >
>> > There's a possibility that we might have a GNOME Booth at CEBIT
>> Eurasia,
>> > and we might need GNOME Event Box for that event.
>> >
>> > Expo is 5 days long, and it's possible that we will there for 5 days.
>>
Here is a draft map of the current wgo structure:
http://live.gnome.org/GnomeWeb/CurrentWgoStructure
It was generated by running `tree -L 3 -d -I "CVS"` over the
gnomeweb-wml module. I will try to create a new version over the actual
website directory as soon as gnomeweb-wml is actually buildab
Hi, Dave!
Open Source is useful in a number of ways but there's no need to
exaggerate its influence, especially not because some projects
re-invented a known wheel after they threw the existing one away.
As a very simple example: Traditional marketing theory tells you to
care about the distributi
On 7/25/06, Claus Schwarm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've never really understood why so many people seem to listen to Doc
> Searls. Maybe, that's because he tells geeks what they would like to
> hear?
yes, exactly. we geeks love to hear these optimistic things about
supposed geeky "revolutio
It just occurred to me, we have to consider CMS performance. Are there
numbers how many hits we get on wgo? Perhaps we need some caching
requirements for the dynamically served pages?
Greg
--
marketing-list mailing list
marketing-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/marketing-li
Hi Gergely,
http://XXX.gnome.org/stats works for www, developer, planet and
foundation. We could probably have this done for selected others too
(live, mail, ...?) - we just need to ask.
Cheers,
Dave.
Gergely Nagy wrote:
> It just occurred to me, we have to consider CMS performance. Are there
>
Hi Claus,
Claus Schwarm wrote:
> Open Source is useful in a number of ways but there's no need to
> exaggerate its influence, especially not because some projects
> re-invented a known wheel after they threw the existing one away.
Free software has changed the way software is produced - that is
Hi Dave,
On Tue, 25 Jul 2006 18:54:36 +0200
Dave Neary <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[snip]
>
> Firefox, by the way, was not a product of marketing. It was the
> product of the will of two people, made possible by the fact that
> it's free software. There was no market analysis, someone said "going
> I still don't think we should rule out a good build system that creates
> static pages.
Agree, and current system can be improved significantly to remove a bunch of
the autofoo problems (having to specify files to publish, updating fifteen
different places when adding a new directory, etc). I'
> The decision must be made also having in mind the context for next
> releases. Aspects as user integration with other web tools we are using,
> integration of eCommerce/donation system and CRM tool are also relevant.
Neither of those things (including the CMS itself) has to be part of how we
a
El dt 25 de 07 del 2006 a les 11:27 +0100, en/na Thomas Wood va
escriure:
> I still don't think we should rule
> out a good build system that creates static pages.
As Greg requests, can the people in favor of keeping the current system
make an evaluation of the requirements, as we are doing with
16 matches
Mail list logo
