> What about filtering p.g.o posts upon tags, including on the home page
> only ones tagged under "GNOME" (of course bloggers must tag all their
> posts)?
>
> Luca
I'm not totally sure but the filter may fail sometimes, exposing the possible
risk of displaying explicit content which is a big NO
On Tue, 2006-09-12 at 23:10 +1000, Jeff Waugh wrote:
>
>
> > I still think that if thousands of readers follow it daily and bloggers
> > fight to get in, it's for a reason. Planet GNOME is one of the most
> > interesting web spaces we have been able to create (for insiders and also
> > GNOME outs
On Wed, 2006-09-13 at 03:48 +1000, Jeff Waugh wrote:
> five unique latest-post hackergotchis (easily done with a Planet template),
> not including titles or summaries == win.
Won, then.
So, we keep the Planet component. The specific elements are to be
defined, but we agree that there won't be t
Op ma, 11-09-2006 te 22:32 -0300, schreef Santiago Roza:
> these are the sources i found so far:
> feel free to add more...
http://tweakers.net/nieuws/44305/Nieuwe-versie-Gnome-ziet-het-levenslicht.html
(Dutch)
regards,
--
Reinout van Schouwen
--
marketing-list mailing list
marketing-list@g
Hi,
If this is a task everyone see as necessary (I think so), I can do
this RoadMap information gathering and organization. Dave, still
needing someone to do this?
p eace
--lucasr
2006/9/12, Dave Neary <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> Hi Quim,
>
> Quim Gil wrote:
> > In short: let's propose to the rele
Jeff Waugh wrote:
>
>
>
>> (2) Instead of posting post excerpts/subject lines on WGO, post other
>> information. E.g., you could just post hackergotchis, the person's name,
>> and how recently they said something on PGO, and where they are from.
>>
>
> That's my preferred option, should
> (2) Instead of posting post excerpts/subject lines on WGO, post other
> information. E.g., you could just post hackergotchis, the person's name,
> and how recently they said something on PGO, and where they are from.
That's my preferred option, should we beyond a banner link to pgo. A row o
Jeff Waugh wrote:
> Planet GNOME *should* be a wild west of "the world, work and lives of GNOME
> contributors". I don't want Michael to stop blogging about Sunday's sermon,
> I don't want Thomas to stop blogging about normal life in a poly family, I
> don't want Zaheer to stop blogging about polit
> The cool gnome-is-people Planet block with its little hackergotchis and
> its genuine content renewed automatically several times a day all year
> round should be discarded to avoid... the rather small probability of
> having offensive words during some hours in the title of a blog post of
> a
On Tue, 2006-09-12 at 23:10 +1000, Jeff Waugh wrote:
> Simple answer: Not knowing which day you're going to have "fuck", "anal sex"
> or "Fascism in the USA" on GNOME's front page. I think the answer here is
> clear: Link Planet GNOME ("personal blogs of project contributors") but only
> display a
Let's agree on terminology first. :) We have plans for 4 nav bars in
total:
- General nav - on the top and common to all GNOME subsites.
- wgo primary nav - to browse wgo sections
- wgo secondary nav - to browse within a section
- breadcrum nav - optional, could be used in deeper situations / we
> I still think that if thousands of readers follow it daily and bloggers
> fight to get in, it's for a reason. Planet GNOME is one of the most
> interesting web spaces we have been able to create (for insiders and also
> GNOME outsiders), therefore there must be a strong reason not to show some
On Tue, 2006-09-12 at 05:47 +0200, karderio wrote:
> A suggestion, if one wished to promote pgo, could be to have a
> sentence/paragraph in the introductory text
Yes, of course. We haven't decided yet the elements of the Planet
component, nor of the rest of components. Don't worry, we are not goi
> Hi again,
>
> On Mon, 2006-09-11 at 23:43 -0400, MáirÃn Duffy wrote:
>
>> http://live.gnome.org/data/GnomeWeb(2f)LooknFeel/attachments/mizmo-wgo-mock-1.png
>
> I also like the general look&feel. It looks like we can go ahead
> defining this style.
I'd like the GNOME logo to be bigger, at leas
Hi again,
On Mon, 2006-09-11 at 23:43 -0400, Máirín Duffy wrote:
> http://live.gnome.org/data/GnomeWeb(2f)LooknFeel/attachments/mizmo-wgo-mock-1.png
I also like the general look&feel. It looks like we can go ahead
defining this style.
> * visual layout - how best to place banner, how and where
On Tue, 2006-09-12 at 07:37 -0400, Máirín Duffy wrote:
> Ahh, fwiw I find it easier to follow the list - after I sent my email
> last night I found a whole new maze of wiki notes. :-/
Me understands, but... wasn't you who had lost track of marketing-list
emails as well? ;)
Tip: in your case f
Let's concentrate on Grandma and Joe, potential GNOME users although not
much into software or freedom. We need to decide what do we want to do
with them since they appear recursively in our discussions.
On Tue, 2006-09-12 at 05:47 +0200, karderio wrote:
> I've been arguing for Joe on the basis
>
> I hacked a theme up in July, and have been patiently nudging people
> since to either put it up or tell me what is wrong with it...
>
> http://mail.gnome.org/archives/gnome-web-list/2006-July/msg4.html
Right - I'll take a look.
- Jeff
--
linux.conf.au 2007: Sydney, Australia
Hi :o)
That's the second person to say "all we are missing is a theme" (the
other off list)...
I hacked a theme up in July, and have been patiently nudging people
since to either put it up or tell me what is wrong with it...
http://mail.gnome.org/archives/gnome-web-list/2006-July/msg4.html
Andreas Nilsson wrote:
> Lee Tambiah had a idea about placing the small banners, where they would
> go into the right side of the page.
> http://www.leetambiah.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/downloads/layoutPlanHome0.5.svg
> Might be a good idea, as we could place as many/few eye-grabber as we
> feel like
> http://live.gnome.org/data/GnomeWeb(2f)LooknFeel/attachments/mizmo-wgo-mock-1.png
Mairin, that looks great. There's something I don't like about the top
bars though. From banners to bottom it looks really smooth.
Gotta run for now, but I'll try to think of something to actually
propose beside n
Máirín Duffy wrote:
> Hi everybody,
>
> So I have a quick mockup that I did a couple weeks ago that I just
> uploaded to the wiki:
>
> http://live.gnome.org/data/GnomeWeb(2f)LooknFeel/attachments/mizmo-wgo-mock-1.png
>
> What I'm trying to explore more than looks/style right now is feel:
>
> * vis
Hi Quim,
Quim Gil wrote:
> In short: let's propose to the release team a call for 2.18 goals to the
> developers.
Maybe you missed this mail I sent to desktop-devel-list last week:
http://mail.gnome.org/archives/desktop-devel-list/2006-September/msg00114.html
I have a file containing all of th
23 matches
Mail list logo
