layout Plan - feedback form

2006-09-18 Thread LeeTambiah
Claus Schwarm has requested an extra block for the second page being a link to feedback form. I personally feel this is unnecessary as the user can get information from the about section. Shall we go with this, drop it, or add as an optional component? Lee -- marketing-list mailing list marketi

Re: Layout Plan

2006-09-18 Thread LeeTambiah
Joachim Noreiko wrote: > --- LeeTambiah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >> The Secondary Page layout is now centre aligned on >> the page[1]. Should >> we apply the centre align to the home page also, at >> current it is left >> aligned. I think the home page should also be centre >> aligned like

Re: Layout Plan

2006-09-18 Thread Joachim Noreiko
--- LeeTambiah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The Secondary Page layout is now centre aligned on > the page[1]. Should > we apply the centre align to the home page also, at > current it is left > aligned. I think the home page should also be centre > aligned like the > Apple site[2]. I agre

Re: LayoutPlan Clarification

2006-09-18 Thread Joachim Noreiko
--- Quim Gil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Joachim, "too many", "heavy" or "impression" are > relative aspects that > might vary substantially depending on the final > look. In > http://mail.gnome.org/archives/marketing-list/2006-September/msg00134.html > there are examples of Apple, YouTube, Yaho

Layout Plan

2006-09-18 Thread LeeTambiah
The Secondary Page layout is now centre aligned on the page[1]. Should we apply the centre align to the home page also, at current it is left aligned. I think the home page should also be centre aligned like the Apple site[2]. [1] http://leetambiah.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk

Re: wgo 2.16.1 timeline

2006-09-18 Thread Quim Gil
wgo 2.16.1 task plan updated: http://live.gnome.org/data/GnomeWeb(2f)DevelopmentTimeline/attachments/2161wgorevamp.html CHANGELOG * Deadline for the CMS selection extended until October 17th (one month from now). If the selection process coordinated by Gergerly gets to a conclusion by then, great

lookandfeel

2006-09-18 Thread LeeTambiah
It may be a good idea to produce impressions of each individual component first. Then when the components look and feel has been accepted they can be moved to make the mock-up. Lee -- marketing-list mailing list marketing-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/marketing-list

Re: LayoutPlan Clarification

2006-09-18 Thread Quim Gil
Joachim, "too many", "heavy" or "impression" are relative aspects that might vary substantially depending on the final look. In http://mail.gnome.org/archives/marketing-list/2006-September/msg00134.html there are examples of Apple, YouTube, Yahoo! and CNN working with 3 horizontal bars. The formu

Re: LayoutPlan Clarification

2006-09-18 Thread Joachim Noreiko
--- LeeTambiah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I did think this too, but have come to like the > idea, lets give the > secondary menu bar as a horizontal component a shot. > See > http://www.apple.com/ and look at the menu bar at > the top. Vision the > Top row as the Primary Bar, and the bar below

Re: LayoutPlan Clarification

2006-09-18 Thread LeeTambiah
Joachim Noreiko wrote: > --- LeeTambiah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >> The breadcrumb component has been dropped, and pages >> have been updated >> have been updated. I have added a new version of the >> secondary page >> "layoutPlanSecondaryPage0.3.svg". Download the .svg >> from >> http://l

Re: WGO Revamp: Look and Feel

2006-09-18 Thread Quim Gil
Going back to > http://live.gnome.org/data/GnomeWeb(2f)LooknFeel/attachments/mizmo-wgo-mock-1.png I have extracted the purely look&feel guidelines that can be deduced from this mockup, from this point Máirín can refine and make additions to be implemented in new mockups. See the updated http://

wgo tagline?

2006-09-18 Thread Quim Gil
Recovering an old comment in the wiki about the need to have a tagline in the header of all the wgo pages. First of all, do we want this tagline? (we need to agree on this before starting another discussion about the GNOME tagline/slogan) :) The comment: "The tag line is a means to communicate

Re: LayoutPlan Clarification

2006-09-18 Thread Joachim Noreiko
--- Quim Gil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > We are doing everything thinking primarily in our > primary audience, > defined at > http://live.gnome.org/GnomeWeb/UseCases#head-f5818f5557175b3c85695eae3325131566b11c98 > > Good that you mention Web Personas. I was waiting a > good moment to > request

Re: LayoutPlan Clarification

2006-09-18 Thread Gezim Hoxha
On Mon, 2006-18-09 at 09:57 +0200, Quim Gil wrote: > On Sun, 2006-09-17 at 21:18 -0600, Gezim Hoxha wrote: > > On another note, if we look at the Webpersonas wikipage[1], we'll see > > that out of 5 personas, 3 have zero, 1 has low to medium, and 1 has > > medium free software awareness. Is the lay

Re: LayoutPlan Clarification

2006-09-18 Thread Joachim Noreiko
--- LeeTambiah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The breadcrumb component has been dropped, and pages > have been updated > have been updated. I have added a new version of the > secondary page > "layoutPlanSecondaryPage0.3.svg". Download the .svg > from > http://live.gnome.org/GnomeWeb/PageStructure.

Re: LayoutPlan Clarification

2006-09-18 Thread Quim Gil
On Sun, 2006-09-17 at 21:18 -0600, Gezim Hoxha wrote: > Why are the two links that should[?] point to the same thing? The Get Involved block came before the draft of a wgo primary nav bar with a "Contribute" link. This block is the weakest in the homepage right column and it might drop if the colu