On Sat, 2006-10-28 at 19:04 +0200, Thilo Pfennig wrote:
> 1) I think certainly this must be integrated into the upcoming CMS.
This is the clear option when we have only one reseller. Having only two
already complicates a bit the process, but I guess is doable.
Another thing to be considered are
Thilo, nothing personal but I disagree again. ;)
I don't think we should modify the logo based on countries or languages.
Everywhere and in every language Nike is Nike, Honda is Honda, Firefox
is Firefox... and I think GNOME should be GNOME.
If you want to add flags or whatever local graphic you
I would leave this up to the brand experts, but I have to disagree
with you here, Quim- as long as it is identifiably GNOME, people
should be encouraged to 'own' the brand and make it their own. If that
means customizing it for their country/team/whatever, great. The
universal, tightly controlled b
On Sun, 2006-10-29 at 08:56 -0500, Luis Villa wrote:
> I would leave this up to the brand experts, but I have to disagree
> with you here, Quim- as long as it is identifiably GNOME, people
> should be encouraged to 'own' the brand and make it their own. If that
> means customizing it for their coun
Sorry, I should have made clear that my only concern was about using
flags in connection of locale languages, not aboutn the logo derivations
in general.
I also think people should be encouraged to own the brand and I like the
collection of derivatives proposed by Máirín in the brandbook. I fully
We try to design new site for gnome.org.tr. I think may be gnome.org
want to use different design at now. I have a suggestion for
gnome.org :
http://img49.imageshack.us/img49/1953/gnometurkeytest1mu6bo4.jpg
What do you think about new design suggestion ?
--
marketing-list mailing list
marketing
Quim Gil wrote:
> PS: reading twice Thilo's email I see he also agrees that "using flags
> for languages is a bad idea"
I kind of think it depends on the language and the context surrounding
it, though. I think for a language like Japanese or say Irish Gaelic
where the language really is mostly
> So I guess in a nutshell I don't think we should dictate whether or not
> flags must be used. I wouldn't completely ban them completely, however.
We (roughly) do in GNOME itself, due to all the political issues with flags.
The problem with having clear-cut cases and less clear-cut cases is tha
Hi,
Quim Gil wrote:
> Killermundi will define the final price for each product and the cut
> that would go to the GNOME Foundation.
It would be nice to negociate this and have a price in the contract,
rather than leave it up to their good will. This is what I have done in
my (failed) attempts in
Hi,
Quim Gil wrote:
> DESIGN
>
> Who is designing the products? We? Killermundi? Both? Depends on the
> product?
We need to reduce the work we have to do. So Killermundi designs, but we
have a veto on designs (all designs have to be approved by GNOME,
perhaps in writing).
Cheers,
Dave.
--
D
> I don't think it's particularly painful having the payment platform off
> gnome.org, but I hope that they can style it so that it doesn't look
> completely different.
To the contrary, if the shop is not operated by us, the payment gateway area
should look utterly different (albeit with a GNOME
11 matches
Mail list logo
