Re: Take the tour draft page

2007-02-04 Thread Quim Gil
On 2/4/07, John Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Great idea. Can I take it that the page elements, fonts and colours are > all approved and set in stone? Or will you consider suggestions? Forget about look&feel, UI, technical aspects... they are still being worked at gnome-web-list. Here

Re: Take the tour draft page

2007-02-04 Thread Panos Laganakos
I'm delivering a contract job this week, so I'm hoping to devote some time to it after that. I'll be keeping you up to date :) On 2/4/07, Quim Gil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > http://gnome.jardigrec.eu/en/take-the-tour/take-the-tour/ > > Suggestion: let's concentrate thought and work in this sing

Re: Take the tour draft page

2007-02-04 Thread John Williams
> Suggestion: let's concentrate thought and work in this single page in > order to set the tone, quality standards and implicit guidelines for > the rest of pages to be created. Great idea. Can I take it that the page elements, fonts and colours are all approved and set in stone? Or will you cons

Take the tour draft page

2007-02-04 Thread Quim Gil
http://gnome.jardigrec.eu/en/take-the-tour/take-the-tour/ Suggestion: let's concentrate thought and work in this single page in order to set the tone, quality standards and implicit guidelines for the rest of pages to be created. Forget about the current URL and the fact that there is no "Take th

Re: Release notes and wgo revamp

2007-02-04 Thread Quim Gil
Hi, Diego: > I see, I just read something about that on the wiki. We spent literally months planning and also documenting in wiki pages what we planned. I recommend you to pick one task (and only one task to start with), make sure you know everything about it and then execute until you complete

Re: Release notes and wgo revamp

2007-02-04 Thread Joachim
On 2/4/07, Claus Schwarm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Sun, 4 Feb 2007 12:43:25 + Joachim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > There are no writers to create the content. There is content at the current WGO. In fact, lots of content. That was the point of my initial mail. There's a fair amoun

Re: Release notes and wgo revamp

2007-02-04 Thread Claus Schwarm
Hi, Joachim! On Sun, 4 Feb 2007 12:43:25 + Joachim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > There are no writers to create the content. There is content at the current WGO. In fact, lots of content. That was the point of my initial mail. > There is no indication that waiting 6 months will produce w

Re: Release notes and wgo revamp

2007-02-04 Thread Joachim
On 2/4/07, Claus Schwarm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Maybe, it's better to look straight at the facts: Moving to the Plone system now will just make things worse. Try doing it for 2.20 There are no writers to create the content. There is no indication that waiting 6 months will produce writers

Re: Release notes and wgo revamp

2007-02-04 Thread Claus Schwarm
On Sun, 4 Feb 2007 00:04:17 +0200 "Quim Gil" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > There is a lot of work to do and we don't seem to progress much (or at > least not as much as we need to deliver something good by March 14th) > > We need to be clever reciclyng as much work as possible. Here is a > proposa