Hi,
I have started to work out some plan for the projects (
http://live.gnome.org/GnomeWeb/ProjectsPages) as this was not started yet. I
like to know how we will distinguish this. I would like to know what the
status of the Plone Software Center is and how the projects page shuld
relate t the p
On Thu, 2007-02-22 at 17:17 -0500, Behdad Esfahbod wrote:
> On Fri, 2007-02-23 at 11:12 +1300, John Williams wrote:
> >
> > Let's do this, but let's not kid ourselves as to the value of the
> > data. I can see us putting it in press releases and feeding to
> > journalists, but not much else.
>
On Fri, 2007-02-23 at 11:12 +1300, John Williams wrote:
>
> Let's do this, but let's not kid ourselves as to the value of the
> data. I can see us putting it in press releases and feeding to
> journalists, but not much else.
I'm more concerned about the bias of any data gathered from the
gnome.
On Thu, 2007-02-22 at 21:20 +0200, Quim Gil wrote:
> > 5. One last question - what will you do with the information?
This is the key issue, all else is mere technical details.
> I also want to know the answer. :) I'm confident that a good
> marketing team will find good questions and a strategy
It's not a secret that we need urgent help to achieve the wgo revamp
goals by the GNOME 2.18 release. Now and then we get help offers from
web designers or coders. The sad truth is though, that what we
desperately need is people able to write plain English, and even go to
simpler tasks like doing a
Somehow I like this idea. Well tuned.
I'm not sure if a feedback form just like that will work. "What for?"
- people think. In many cases websites offer all kind of promotions in
order to get a decent amount of feedback. We don want (and don't need)
to do this.
Instead, why not doing this as an e
On Thu, 2007-02-22 at 11:10 -0500, Behdad Esfahbod wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-02-22 at 09:07 -0500, Ben Konrath wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I just sent Rosanna the address to send the box so if everyone agrees
> > that we can use the box, we should be good to go from my end.
>
> The board decided to s
On 2/19/07, Paul Cutler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> LiveCD: According to this wiki page (
> http://live.gnome.org/GnomeLiveMedia) it says: "It is not
> a target to do an official version for GNOME 2.18". If we do:
> LiveCD: I think that's a great idea. I've been reading through the
> documenta
On Thu, 2007-02-22 at 09:07 -0500, Ben Konrath wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I just sent Rosanna the address to send the box so if everyone agrees
> that we can use the box, we should be good to go from my end.
The board decided to ship the box. Rosanna will be in contact with you
about the shipment.
b
Hi,
Thilo Pfennig wrote:
> I suggest that we put a feedback from on the homepage www.gnome.org.
> The feedbacks should be analyzed autoamtically.
I appreciate suggestions like this, but it's the automatic analysis that
makes me worried...
1. How will this fit in with the wgo design? An extra l
I suggest that we put a feedback from on the homepage www.gnome.org.
The feedbacks should be analyzed autoamtically.
So some data should be mutliple choice. I would put questions in like:
* How did you hear about GNOME?
* Do you use more than one computer?
* What version of GNOME are you using?
Hi all,
I just sent Rosanna the address to send the box so if everyone agrees
that we can use the box, we should be good to go from my end.
Thanks, Ben
On Wed, 2007-02-21 at 18:09 -0500, Rosanna Yuen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> In order to get the box there in time, I would need to schedule the
> pickup
12 matches
Mail list logo
