Forgot to explain the (*) in
> Gervais needs to deliver a final text and graphics (*) tomorrow Friday
We have some more hours/days with the graphics if you use dummy
screenshots with real names. Then you can substitute the images
without interfeering XML formatting and translation work.
We haven
Let's agree a hard deadline, otherwise we can keep adding items and
suggesting ideas until 2.18.1.
Gervais needs to deliver a final text and graphics (*) tomorrow Friday
by 12pm (midday) UTC - latest. From that point someone (Vincent?) will
pick it and send it to the DocBook & L10n machineries.
T
I'll add NM as well.
On 3/7/07, Evandro Fernandes Giovanini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Em Dom, 2007-03-04 às 19:30 -0500, Gervais Mulongoy escreveu:
> Hello everyone:
>
> I have attached a link to a working draft.
>
> http://live.gnome.org/TwoPointSeventeen/ReleaseNotes/Draft
>
> Let me know wh
Em Dom, 2007-03-04 às 19:30 -0500, Gervais Mulongoy escreveu:
> Hello everyone:
>
> I have attached a link to a working draft.
>
> http://live.gnome.org/TwoPointSeventeen/ReleaseNotes/Draft
>
> Let me know what you think, ok?
>
Great work.
One thing I'd like to add is that I think NetworkMa
Hi,
the live cd is in desperate need of some material. We have thought of some
really nice PDFs. I think to target the users we should keep in mind:
* Those who downloaded GNOME live cd already have it. (ok thats silly)
* The PDFs should talk to the user and make him wanting to use GNOME / give
Hi Quim!
Quim Gil wrote:
> On 3/7/07, Andreas Nilsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Do we need graphics for all the pages, or are some more critical than
>> others?
>
> Critical-critical there is nothing critical if we consider that the
> main reference now is to improve the current wgo - which is
On 3/7/07, Andre Klapper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, den 07.03.2007, 19:43 +0200 schrieb Panos Laganakos:
> > Made a smaller version of the 02 mockup, codename: "Shot on the big toe" :)
> >
> > http://www.flickr.com/photos/panosl/413797492/
>
> i also like that one, but i still wonder
Am Mittwoch, den 07.03.2007, 19:43 +0200 schrieb Panos Laganakos:
> Made a smaller version of the 02 mockup, codename: "Shot on the big toe" :)
>
> http://www.flickr.com/photos/panosl/413797492/
i also like that one, but i still wonder where we will get the
(currently non-existing) t-shirts and m
On Wed, 2007-03-07 at 19:43 +0200, Panos Laganakos wrote:
> Made a smaller version of the 02 mockup, codename: "Shot on the big toe" :)
>
> http://www.flickr.com/photos/panosl/413797492/
I'm loving this one, great job Panos!
Regards,
pedro.
--
marketing-list mailing list
marketing-list@gnome.
On 3/7/07, Andreas Nilsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Do we need graphics for all the pages, or are some more critical than
> others?
Critical-critical there is nothing critical if we consider that the
main reference now is to improve the current wgo - which is really dry
on graphics.
However,
On 3/6/07, Andreas Nilsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Fernando Herrera pointed to this article in #gnome-hackers.
http://www.movial.fi/en/company/Press_Releases/?PressId=61
Now gone?
--
Thilo Pfennig
http://wiki.foresightlinux.com/confluence/display/~vinci/
--
marketing-list mailing list
Made a smaller version of the 02 mockup, codename: "Shot on the big toe" :)
http://www.flickr.com/photos/panosl/413797492/
On 3/7/07, Andre Klapper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, den 07.03.2007, 13:11 +0200 schrieb Lucas Rocha:
> > I like the idea. We'd need to discuss this in web list
Am Mittwoch, den 07.03.2007, 13:11 +0200 schrieb Lucas Rocha:
> I like the idea. We'd need to discuss this in web list to get some
> feedback though.
>
> Another issue is that we probably want to have a SoC banner in w.g.o
> front page during the student application period (March 14-24).
i also
Hei Andreas,
I like the idea. We'd need to discuss this in web list to get some
feedback though.
Another issue is that we probably want to have a SoC banner in w.g.o
front page during the student application period (March 14-24).
--lucasr
2007/3/7, Andreas Nilsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Lucas
Lucas Rocha wrote:
> Hei Andre,
>
> The next bugday (March 21) is only on week after GNOME 2.18 release. I
> don't think we should replace the GNOME 2.18 release banner that
> early.
>
> I wish we had a solution for having more banners in w.g.o front page.
>
> --lucasr
>
Hi Luca!
It could work w
Quim Gil wrote:
> http://live.gnome.org/GnomeWeb/RevampShowstoppers
>
> Please check if there is a showstopper missing, We will release the
> site the day the list is clean. Ideally the 14th, if not the 15th, if
> not...
>
> Let's keep the sprint mode, please. We can make it.
>
> fyi, I have unpubl
16 matches
Mail list logo
