On Thu, 2007-08-02 at 07:50 +0300, Quim Gil wrote:
The release team has announced feature freeze for GNOME 2.19 and the
roadmapping team has got a nice http://live.gnome.org/RoadMap in
place. In theory most of the content of the GNOME 2.20 release notes
could be written now.
[After looking
Jorge has already started this. Here's an email that I sent to some of
the release-team team
I mean, release-notes team. (which isn't a mailing list)
a couple of days ago, as context:
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.murrayc.com
www.openismus.com
--
marketing-list mailing list
He didn't have a preference when it came to Linux distributions so he
tested a number of them. The SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop (SLED) stood out
for Giroux. It came with the GNOME desktop, which he regards as faster than
most, Firefox, which is the company's preferred browser, and the Citrix
This is great, but I actually wish he had more reasons to choose
GNOME. Faster is just one of many advantages, oh well.
--Ken
On 8/2/07, Jeff Waugh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
He didn't have a preference when it came to Linux distributions so he
tested a number of them. The SUSE Linux Enterprise
Jeff Waugh wrote:
He didn't have a preference when it came to Linux distributions so he
tested a number of them. The SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop (SLED) stood out
for Giroux. It came with the GNOME desktop, which he regards as faster than
most, Firefox, which is the company's preferred
quote who=Ken VanDine
This is great, but I actually wish he had more reasons to choose GNOME.
Faster is just one of many advantages, oh well.
I'm sure he did, but that was the most straightforward quote. Anyone up for
doing a more in-depth case study with them?
- Jeff
--
linux.conf.au 2008:
I think we should try to do a story on this for GNOME Journal
On 8/2/07, Andreas Nilsson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jeff Waugh wrote:
He didn't have a preference when it came to Linux distributions so he
tested a number of them. The SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop (SLED) stood out
for Giroux.
On 8/2/07, Ken VanDine [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think we should try to do a story on this for GNOME Journal
To become at the same time a success story for wgo (we are just
waiting to have a bunch of stories to open the section in the revamped
wgo).
Why not asking the journalist. He is
On 8/2/07, Murray Cumming [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I also want to try putting everything on one page, but I still plan to
use the docbook translation system. We have no other way to do
translation at the moment, and it does work well.
Yes, yes, I wasn't questioning the use of DocBook. I only
I don't completely agree, as a distro maintainer that will be
delivering 2.20 on 2.20 release day, our users want to read about it.
We should write that content, not the distro. It is less interesting
for users of other distros that take much longer to integrate the new
version, but even those
On 8/2/07, Quim Gil [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 8/2/07, Murray Cumming [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I also want to try putting everything on one page, but I still plan to
use the docbook translation system. We have no other way to do
translation at the moment, and it does work well.
Yes,
As the maintainer of a distro with a strong and explicit focus in
GNOME you will appreciate a page where to point your users, yes. But
aren't Foresight users falling mostly in the audiences I'm suggesting?
Wouldn't they enjoy be treated as power users, developers and the
like?
This would apply to
Yes many of our users are power users, but we are also gaining quite
a bit of traction in the new linux user category. Which is what we
really want, the power users are easy to get. We want the new users
to want to use GNOME and Foresight. I would be very happy if what we
did was provide
13 matches
Mail list logo
