Allan wrote:
What are these metrics intended to indicate? The amount of work that has
gone into GNOME 3? Changes since 2.0 don't necessarily map onto that. I
also suspect it will be way too difficult to pull out the required
numbers for this. You could maybe focus on one or two key modules: line
On 03/25/2011 08:48 AM, Juanjo Marin wrote:
El jue, 24-03-2011 a las 16:13 -0400, Sumana Harihareswara escribió:
John: How would you feel about an approximation along the lines of
"hundreds of thousands of users" (or whatever a verifiably correct order
of magnitude is)?
I think to say GNOME ha
Dave Neary wrote:
> > "GNOME 3 will reach [number] of users around the world." What's a
> > reasonable number to predict?
>
> Ah, now we're getting into whether GNOME apps & platform + Unity = GNOME
> 3. Touchy subject...
We're primarily marketing GNOME 3 as the GNOME 3 desktop. It would seem
Hi,
Sumana Harihareswara wrote:
> John: How would you feel about an approximation along the lines of
> "hundreds of thousands of users" (or whatever a verifiably correct order
> of magnitude is)?
Millions or tens of millions is better. Canonical updated their user
count to 12 million last year:
Hi,
Sumana Harihareswara wrote:
> I'm working on the press release and I'm finding it hard to figure out:
>
> About how many users can I claim GNOME has? (To simplify: the desktop,
> not the platform.)
I was previously asked this question & did a back of the envelope
calculation based on guesst
On Thu, 2011-03-24 at 15:18 -0400, Sumana Harihareswara wrote:
> I'm working on the press release and I'm finding it hard to figure out:
>
> About how many users can I claim GNOME has? (To simplify: the desktop,
> not the platform.)
>
> "GNOME 3 will reach [number] of users around the world."
Sriram Ramkrishna wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 11:12 AM, Brian Cameron
> wrote:
>
> My understanding was that GNOME 3.0 was simply not targeting
> these
> users, and that the expectation was that Fallback/Classic mode
> would
> be ready for such
