On Mon, 2007-02-19 at 17:55 -0300, Santiago Roza wrote:
> On 2/19/07, John Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> > Around 1,000 is sufficient if all we want to do is compare
> > two or three percentages (e.g. GNOME, KDE, Windows) with a margin of
> > error of around +/- 3% at the 95% confiden
On 2/19/07, John Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Around 1,000 is sufficient if all we want to do is compare
> two or three percentages (e.g. GNOME, KDE, Windows) with a margin of
> error of around +/- 3% at the 95% confidence level.
problem is that our market share (and maybe even the enti
On Mon, 2007-02-19 at 18:06 +0100, Claus Schwarm wrote:
> Hi!
>
> On Mon, 19 Feb 2007 15:44:17 +0100
> Andreas Nilsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Rather than some numbers on what desktop enviroment that people who
> > visit linuxquestions.org happens to like for the day, is there any
> > w
Hi!
On Mon, 19 Feb 2007 15:44:17 +0100
Andreas Nilsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Rather than some numbers on what desktop enviroment that people who
> visit linuxquestions.org happens to like for the day, is there any
> way we could mesure how GNOME is doing compared to Windows and OSX
> sinc
Claus Schwarm wrote:
> Hi!
>
> The results are in. A summary of the winners can be found here:
>
> http://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/showthread.php?t=530202
>
> Detailed numbers can be found here:
>
> http://www.linuxquestions.org/awards
>
>
> Concerning the votes for the "Desktop Enviro
Hi!
The results are in. A summary of the winners can be found here:
http://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/showthread.php?t=530202
Detailed numbers can be found here:
http://www.linuxquestions.org/awards
Concerning the votes for the "Desktop Enviroment of the Year",
the history looks li
