Allan:
I've contact the legal team to see what the best way forward is.
In the meantime, I've dialed back the brand guidelines [1] to their
previous state and moved the new material to a new page [2] where it can
be developed in isolation.
Thanks!
Brian
--
marketing-list mailing list
market
On Fri, 2011-04-29 at 15:13 -0500, Brian Cameron wrote:
> Allan:
>
> > The question seems to be what the most appropriate place for this
> > content is. Can the specification of our logo usage sit on the same page
> > as a potentially looser set of branding guidelines and still perform its
> > leg
Allan:
The question seems to be what the most appropriate place for this
content is. Can the specification of our logo usage sit on the same page
as a potentially looser set of branding guidelines and still perform its
legal function?
Sounds like a question for legal-l...@gnome.org.
Another
On Thu, 2011-04-28 at 22:07 +0200, Dave Neary wrote:
> Hi Allan,
>
> Allan Day wrote:
> > I wasn't aware that the brand guidelines are official or legal
> > documents. They are guidelines. Maybe the foundation should bless them
> > with officialdom... I'm not sure what that would achieve though.
>
Hi Allan,
Allan Day wrote:
> I wasn't aware that the brand guidelines are official or legal
> documents. They are guidelines. Maybe the foundation should bless them
> with officialdom... I'm not sure what that would achieve though.
It's to do with sucky trademark laws. If you trademark something,
Allan:
On 04/28/11 10:12 AM, Allan Day wrote:
On Thu, 2011-04-28 at 08:59 -0500, Brian Cameron wrote:
Refer to section 1.a.iii, which requires GNOME Users Groups to follow
these Brand Guidelines. Since we provide such direction in a document
that GNOME Users Groups sign, I would consider it l
On Thu, 2011-04-28 at 08:59 -0500, Brian Cameron wrote:
> Allan:
>
> On 04/28/11 08:32 AM, Allan Day wrote:
> > Brian Cameron wrote:
> >> Allan:
> >> We typically have our lawyers review official documents that relate to
> >> legal issues such as trademark before we make changes to them. Is this
Allan:
On 04/28/11 08:32 AM, Allan Day wrote:
Brian Cameron wrote:
Allan:
We typically have our lawyers review official documents that relate to
legal issues such as trademark before we make changes to them. Is this
because the Wiki version of our Guidelines is not yet official? Most
officia
Brian Cameron wrote:
> Allan:
>
> We typically have our lawyers review official documents that relate to
> legal issues such as trademark before we make changes to them. Is this
> because the Wiki version of our Guidelines is not yet official? Most
> official GNOME legal documents should probabl
Allan:
We typically have our lawyers review official documents that relate to
legal issues such as trademark before we make changes to them. Is this
because the Wiki version of our Guidelines is not yet official? Most
official GNOME legal documents should probably be in
http://foundation.gnome
Hi all,
I spent some time elaborating our brand guidelines [1] today. The
sections that I added are marked as draft status. Feedback would be
welcome.
To date, the guidelines only addressed the GNOME logo and its usage. My
aim with the update is to expand them to cover terminology and
additional
11 matches
Mail list logo
