El vie, 23-12-2005 a las 01:10 -0300, Santiago Roza escribió:
However, if we put legitimate gnome content, you
think that will encourage shady gnome content to get uploaded as well?
if we put legitimate gnome content once, that will encourage people to
help and make their own special
No big deal, but a useful tip.
and i didn't make a big deal out of it. i just said we should stay
out of p2p networks other than bittorrent.
In the kiosks you can buy porn and lots of non-free software magazines.
Same with CDs, DVDs and the WWW itself. Do we want to be associated with
On 12/23/05, Thilo Pfennig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Fedora , SuSE, many distributions already
use these networks as a way of distribution.
are you SURE of what you're saying? are you sure that fedora core or
suse are using p2p networks OTHER THAN BITTORRENT (the one i already
said -many times-
En/na Santiago Roza ha escrit:
on the other hand, as a tech journalist myself i tend to be well
informed about these issues.
Then, my journalist colleague, you should we careful when writing that
something is ilegal when no judge has declared its ilegality.
Where have you seen a judge
I overlooked the other then phrase. sorry.
Surely Bittorent is the protocol which is mostly used for illegal
movie downloads. i don't really see how a protocol can be illegal if
it is not.
--
http://www.pfennigsolutions.de
--
marketing-list mailing list
marketing-list@gnome.org
On Wed, 2005-12-21 at 04:31 -0500, Jason Ronda wrote:
Ok, we all know about Google but since this is a marketing list I just
wanted to make sure if we were in a position to try to push the idea
and ask our user base to get including GNOME related stuff in their
own P2P shared files.
snip
I also think it's a good idea. Add the .exe GNOME applications
available, all the marketing materials we have
Also BitTorrent links help, they are increasingly used in the
activist/artist/creatove/unconformist environments, where free software
is increasignly understood and arising
I think it great idea.
A cool Naming convention would be,
gnome-all-2.14-solaris10-x86.tar.bz2 ???
Yes I can just imagine a evolution-2.4-keygen.exe, appearing.
:)
Karl
On Thu, 2005-12-22 at 02:51 -0700, Gezim Hoxha wrote:
On Wed, 2005-12-21 at 04:31 -0500, Jason Ronda wrote:
Ok, we all
hmm i don't think it's a good idea.
bittorrent? ok many free software projects are using it, so its image
is 50% legal 50% warez (+mp3 +divx +pr0n).
but the other networks are 99% about warez... do we really want to be
associated with that?
... not to mention the fact that we can't control
However, if we put legitimate gnome content, you
think that will encourage shady gnome content to get uploaded as well?
if we put legitimate gnome content once, that will encourage people to
help and make their own special versions (compressed with rar with
their very own password and some
Mmmm... we are simply talking about recommending in a paragraph of a
spread-gnome page somewhere in gnome.org that users of P2P networks have
GNOME related files in their shared folders, isn't it? I mean, no big
campaign. No big deal, but a useful tip.
In the kiosks you can buy porn and lots of
Hi list,
And this is another story I just wanted to comment with you. I once was
taking about Linux and GNOME with my young cousin who was using
his Windows computer and when he got a bit interested in trying it he
just opened a window with his favorite P2P client (in this case BearShare
which
12 matches
Mail list logo
