Re: GNOME files disabled

2008-09-04 Thread Stormy Peters
Does somebody on the list have the right access to do this? And the time to do this? Stormy On Tue, Sep 2, 2008 at 9:18 AM, Claus Schwarm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > according to a post by Eugenia Loli-Queru, GNOME files was hacked and > she has no intentions to re-activate the site.[1]

Re: GNOME files disabled

2008-09-04 Thread Diego Escalante Urrelo
Hi Stormy On 9/4/08, Stormy Peters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Does somebody on the list have the right access to do this? And the time to > do this? > I just did[0], I disabled /softwaremap/ and commented the reference to Get More Software in /community/. For your future reference, all gnome w

Re: GNOME files disabled

2008-09-04 Thread Stormy Peters
What was gnomefiles? It sounds like a list of files found in GNOME but I don't want to assume. :) Stormy On Thu, Sep 4, 2008 at 1:38 PM, Diego Escalante Urrelo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: > Hi Stormy > > On 9/4/08, Stormy Peters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Does somebody on the list have the righ

Re: GNOME files disabled

2008-09-04 Thread Luis Villa
On Thu, Sep 4, 2008 at 3:45 PM, Stormy Peters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > What was gnomefiles? It sounds like a list of files found in GNOME but I > don't want to assume. :) closer to addons.mozilla.org- information (including updates, news, etc.) about applications available for GNOME. One of th

Re: GNOME files disabled

2008-09-04 Thread Dave Neary
Luis Villa wrote: > On Thu, Sep 4, 2008 at 3:45 PM, Stormy Peters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> What was gnomefiles? It sounds like a list of files found in GNOME but I >> don't want to assume. :) > > closer to addons.mozilla.org- information (including updates, news, > etc.) about applications av

Re: GNOME files disabled

2008-09-04 Thread Luis Villa
On Thu, Sep 4, 2008 at 4:15 PM, Dave Neary <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Luis Villa wrote: >> On Thu, Sep 4, 2008 at 3:45 PM, Stormy Peters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> What was gnomefiles? It sounds like a list of files found in GNOME but I >>> don't want to assume. :) >> >> closer to addons.mozi

Re: GNOME files disabled

2008-09-04 Thread Sayamindu Dasgupta
On Fri, Sep 5, 2008 at 2:01 AM, Luis Villa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, Sep 4, 2008 at 4:15 PM, Dave Neary <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Luis Villa wrote: >>> On Thu, Sep 4, 2008 at 3:45 PM, Stormy Peters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: What was gnomefiles? It sounds like a list of files fo

Re: GNOME files disabled

2008-09-04 Thread Claus Schwarm
Hi, On Thu, 4 Sep 2008 14:38:34 -0500 "Diego Escalante Urrelo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Stormy > > On 9/4/08, Stormy Peters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Does somebody on the list have the right access to do this? And the > > time to do this? > > > > I just did[0], I disabled /software

Re: GNOME files disabled

2008-09-05 Thread Simos Xenitellis
On Thu, Sep 4, 2008 at 8:45 PM, Stormy Peters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > What was gnomefiles? It sounds like a list of files found in GNOME but I > don't want to assume. :) You can see how the website looked like at http://web.archive.org/web/*/http://www.gnomefiles.org/ Also, for individual pr

Re: GNOME files disabled

2008-09-05 Thread Thilo Pfennig
Claus Schwarm schrieb: > It's just not as efficient as for other platforms because releases are > rather boring if they cannot be installed easily and immediately. That > was the central problem of gnomefiles. > > Not specific to gnomefiles.org. Thats the same problem gnome.org has. Like new GN

Re: GNOME files disabled

2008-09-06 Thread Simos Xenitellis
On Sat, Sep 6, 2008 at 6:34 AM, Thilo Pfennig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Claus Schwarm schrieb: >> It's just not as efficient as for other platforms because releases are >> rather boring if they cannot be installed easily and immediately. That >> was the central problem of gnomefiles. >> >> > > N

Re: GNOME files disabled

2008-09-08 Thread Thilo Pfennig
Simos Xenitellis schrieb: > On Sat, Sep 6, 2008 at 6:34 AM, Thilo Pfennig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Claus Schwarm schrieb: >> >>> It's just not as efficient as for other platforms because releases are >>> rather boring if they cannot be installed easily and immediately. That >>> was t

Re: GNOME files disabled

2008-09-09 Thread Sriram Ramkrishna
Can we not just port the existing gnomefiles website over? It is better than nothing. We haev http://www.gtk-apps.org. But I'm not very enthuisastica bout this site and it's application list is not complete. sri On Tue, Sep 02, 2008 at 05:18:16PM +0200, Claus Schwarm wrote: > Hi, > > accord

Re: GNOME files disabled

2008-09-09 Thread Andreas Nilsson
Sriram Ramkrishna wrote: Can we not just port the existing gnomefiles website over? It is better than nothing. We haev http://www.gtk-apps.org. But I'm not very enthuisastica bout this site and it's application list is not complete. sri From http://web.archive.org/web/20071212224222/w

Re: GNOME files disabled

2008-09-10 Thread Dave Neary
Hi, Andreas Nilsson wrote: >> From > http://web.archive.org/web/20071212224222/www.gnomefiles.org/contact.php: > "The developer & owner of Gnomefiles' PHP source code is Eugenia Loli. > OSNews LLC (the company behind GnomeFiles) is using the source code > under a special licensing condition (at

Re: GNOME files disabled

2008-09-10 Thread Claus Schwarm
Hi, On Tue, 09 Sep 2008 21:31:21 +0200 Andreas Nilsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > From > http://web.archive.org/web/20071212224222/www.gnomefiles.org/contact.php: > "The developer & owner of Gnomefiles' PHP source code is Eugenia > Loli. OSNews LLC (the company behind GnomeFiles) is using the