Hi,
Santiago Roza a écrit :
> maybe because we didn't have any benchmarks available, i guess. how
> could we have them for future releases?
The Evolution guys had (and sent us) benchmarks, Federico Mena, Ben
Maurer, Cecilia Gonzalez Alvarez, Phillip van Hoof, Behdad Esfahbod...
all of these p
On Tue, 26 Sep 2006 16:40:43 +0200
Dave Neary <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> OK - it's clear that you're saying all these things to people other
> than those who should be hearing it.
>
Ehm, pardon? You started talking about the *vision* and how the
marketing team is supposed to handle things a
Hi,
Claus Schwarm a écrit :
> Can you provide a rationale why do you think the time of developers is
> so much more valuable than anybody else's time?
> I was just talking about efficient organization: to minimize the work
> load for everybody, some agreements need to be taken care of. So, if
Hi,
a few notes:
On Tue, 26 Sep 2006 14:24:03 +0200
Dave Neary <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So yes, I think it is important for people interested in
> promoting GNOME (and particularly release notes writers) be aware of
> it.
There's a difference between being 'aware of it' and following it
cl
--- Dave Neary <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > There's a lot of stuff people talk about on pgo.
> What do you think?
> > That release notes writers have nothing better to
> do than taking notes
> > about stuff developers say somewhere on the
> Internet?
>
> Well, it's my primary news source to k
Hi,
I'm feeling some aggression and defensiveness here which I'm going to
put down to cultural differences. I will say, though, that we all have a
part to play in improving things, and I think that this could have been
addressed better if I'd brought it up before the release (mea culpa).
Clau
On Tue, 2006-09-26 at 09:21 +0200, Dave Neary wrote:
> If there's one thing I regret it's that we didn't push this release as
> "The big performance push"
To me this is simply a proof that the release notes process followed
until now is either outdated or broken. The people who took over the
2.16
Hi Claus,
Claus Schwarm a écrit :
> This is what could be made after feedback from a helpful Evolution
> developer. Read it and ask yourself how many people are really
> affected by these improvements. I'm not sure whether that would have
> been sufficient to produce the headlines you're thinking
Hi, Dave!
On Tue, 26 Sep 2006 12:19:36 +0200
Dave Neary <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The problem with that page is:
> 1. technical focus, rather than user focus ("here are operations
> which are faster", rather than "Here are high-level usecases which
> are faster")
> 2. The language is prett
> I'm sorry I didn't bring this up before the release, when it would have
> been more useful. Let's just learn the lesson, and make sure our finger
> is on the pulse next time, and give kudos where it's due.
Gathering, sorting, and presenting the release information takes a lot of
time and effort.
Hi,
On Tue, 26 Sep 2006 09:21:34 +0200
Dave Neary <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> To my mind that is definitely a bigger "feature" than "we will have
> more eye candy in future releases thanks to optional XGL support in
> Metacity".
>
Note that a performance page was written. It looked like this:
Murray Cumming a écrit :
>> I'm sorry I didn't bring this up before the release, when it would have
>> been more useful. Let's just learn the lesson, and make sure our finger
>> is on the pulse next time, and give kudos where it's due.
>
> Gathering, sorting, and presenting the release information
Hi,
Santiago Roza a écrit :
> maybe because we didn't have any benchmarks available, i guess. how
> could we have them for future releases?
The Evolution guys had (and sent us) benchmarks, Federico Mena, Ben
Maurer, Cecilia Gonzalez Alvarez, Phillip van Hoof, Behdad Esfahbod...
all of these peo
Quim Gil a écrit :
> Good bits in GNOME 2.16
> http://www.linux.com/article.pl?sid=06/09/18/2031230
>
> Not yet del.icio.us user, sorry.
Gah. "some minor feature enhancements"?
If there's one thing I regret it's that we didn't push this release as
"The big performance push" - there was a wealth
On 9/26/06, Dave Neary <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If there's one thing I regret it's that we didn't push this release as
> "The big performance push" ...
maybe because we didn't have any benchmarks available, i guess. how
could we have them for future releases?
i mean what to measure, with w
Good bits in GNOME 2.16
http://www.linux.com/article.pl?sid=06/09/18/2031230
Not yet del.icio.us user, sorry.
--
Quim Gil /// http://desdeamericaconamor.org | http://pinguino.tv
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
--
marketing-list mailing list
marketing-list@gno
Hi Reinhout,
Are you a del.icio.us user? Fancy tagging it gnome216?
Cheers,
Dave.
Reinout van Schouwen wrote:
> Op ma, 11-09-2006 te 22:32 -0300, schreef Santiago Roza:
>> these are the sources i found so far:
>> feel free to add more...
>
> http://tweakers.net/nieuws/44305/Nieuwe-versie-Gnome
Op ma, 11-09-2006 te 22:32 -0300, schreef Santiago Roza:
> these are the sources i found so far:
> feel free to add more...
http://tweakers.net/nieuws/44305/Nieuwe-versie-Gnome-ziet-het-levenslicht.html
(Dutch)
regards,
--
Reinout van Schouwen
--
marketing-list mailing list
marketing-list@g
Hi Santiago,
If you are a del.icio.us user, then please bookmark these with the tag
gnome216 (you can use more than one tag if you like, but please include
that one). I think I got these three, but there's no harm in having
pages bookmarked more than once.
I haven't seen any Spanish articles boo
these are the sources i found so far:
http://slashdot.org/articles/06/09/07/0240207.shtml
http://arstechnica.com/articles/columns/linux/linux-20060905.ars
http://www.desktoplinux.com/news/NS6261033378.html
feel free to add more...
--
Santiago Roza
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
marketing-list mailing lis
Hi Santiago,
Santiago Roza wrote:
> i don't know about the "young" or "bright" parts :P, but i can do the
> review compiling thing again (i did it for 2.12), in case you guys are
> ok with that.
Thanks for the offer - that would be wonderful. It's a lot of work for
one person if we do it right,
On 9/7/06, Dave Neary <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Again, this
> will be a database of information for some young bright spark with some
> time who would like to analyse all the reviews and slashdot comments
> later on, and make some concrete suggestions based on those comments and
> reviews to th
Hi all,
We need to improve how we push out announcements like the announcement
of the release - while we're waiting for a nice CRM which lets us
mass-mail all the journalists we know, we need to do it by hand.
For each journalist that you know, you might want to drop them a
friendly note saying
23 matches
Mail list logo
