We should bring this up as a thread on ddl when you've compiled it.
(or maybe we should decide here whether we need to bring it up in DDL
as a general discussion or to approach individual maintainers seperately)
Personally, going with the maintainers is a better idea. Opening it
up the peanut gal
John Williams wrote:
On Wed, 2005-12-14 at 21:43 -0300, Santiago Roza wrote:
btw, i'll try to summarize all online comments about this linus/kde
thing. from what i've read so far, they seem to have a couple valid
points we shouldn't be ignoring.
I think that would be very helpful, th
On Wed, 2005-12-14 at 21:43 -0300, Santiago Roza wrote:
> btw, i'll try to summarize all online comments about this linus/kde
> thing. from what i've read so far, they seem to have a couple valid
> points we shouldn't be ignoring.
I think that would be very helpful, thanks!
--
marketing-list ma
> And thanks again to Santiago for collecting the negative reviews. Maybe
> this will give his work more "oomph" in some people's minds?
btw, i'll try to summarize all online comments about this linus/kde
thing. from what i've read so far, they seem to have a couple valid
points we shouldn't be
> I'm not sure if processing feedback will be sufficient.
no existing task is "sufficient" on its own, but there are many
productive steps we could take. and definitely, processing feedback
won't have any use unless developers do something about that feedback.
--
Santiago Roza
Departamento I+D
On Tue, 13 Dec 2005 21:31:51 -0800
Sriram Ramkrishna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think it's best we just let this pass and get back to business. :-)
> No need to continue to drag this through the mud. Rather, this is our
> opportunity to:
>
> a) go through osnews/slashdot looking for decent f
On Tue, 2005-12-13 at 21:31 -0800, Sriram Ramkrishna wrote:
> Rather, this is our opportunity to:
>
> a) go through osnews/slashdot looking for decent feedback
> b) get a feel of what people think about GNOME both good and bad.
>
> and other things.
Hallelujah, brother!
And thanks again to Sa
May be the 2006 Marketing Slogan should be :
Intelligence through Excellence ;)
Karl
On Tue, 2005-12-13 at 22:37 +0200, Žygimantas Beručka wrote:
> An, 2005 12 13 13:29 -0500, Rajiv Vyas rašė:
> > Very strong opinion from an extremely smart and influential guy.
>
> Very smart and influential yes
I think it's best we just let this pass and get back to business. :-)
No need to continue to drag this through the mud. Rather, this is our
opportunity to:
a) go through osnews/slashdot looking for decent feedback
b) get a feel of what people think about GNOME both good and bad.
and other things
Santiago Roza wrote:
> oh god...
> http://linux.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/12/13/1340215
Well the thread is slowly reaching troll stages on
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and GNOMEUsability - so perhaps it would
worthwhile to figure out what exactly Linus is getting at.
And on second thoughts why not blog
Hi,
On 12/14/05, Santiago Roza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > As jdub would roughly put it "Don't Panic".
>
> well i never said we should panic, but it's something we should be
> keeping an eye on.
I don't see a reason to Panic.
This flamewar has been going on for ages and will never end.
So yes,
> As jdub would roughly put it "Don't Panic".
well i never said we should panic, but it's something we should be
keeping an eye on.
--
Santiago Roza
Departamento I+D - Thymbra
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
marketing-list mailing list
marketing-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/marketi
As jdub would roughly put it "Don't Panic".
Jerome Gotangco
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mobile: +639196555242
GPG: 0xA97B69A0
--
marketing-list mailing list
marketing-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/marketing-list
> We need to thank him for generating so much press. That should raise our
> profile in many trade rags. We need to tell the press people we are open
> for
> interviews and what not so that we can give people a balanced view. ;)
Good idea. I've mentioned that on my blog, so it appears on
planet
An, 2005 12 13 13:29 -0500, Rajiv Vyas rašė:
> Very strong opinion from an extremely smart and influential guy.
Very smart and influential yes, intelligent no, YOU FUCKIN IDIOTS.
Considering his mails should we market GNOME as 'intelligent' instead of
'usable'? :) It sounds cool and raises a quest
We need to thank him for generating so much press. That should raise our
profile in many trade rags. We need to tell the press people we are open for
interviews and what not so that we can give people a balanced view. ;)
sri
On Tue, Dec 13, 2005 at 01:29:49PM -0500, Rajiv Vyas wrote:
> Very s
Very strong opinion from an extremely smart and influential guy.
On 12/13/05, Santiago Roza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> oh god...
> http://linux.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/12/13/1340215
>
>
> --
> Santiago Roza
> Departamento I+D - Thymbra
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> --
> marketing-list mailing lis
oh god...
http://linux.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/12/13/1340215
--
Santiago Roza
Departamento I+D - Thymbra
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
marketing-list mailing list
marketing-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/marketing-list
18 matches
Mail list logo
