On 3/12/07, Joachim [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So the questions are:
What do you want to be said about Gnome?
Is it GNOME or Gnome?
What is Gnome anyway?
If I don't get answers to these soon, I will make it up. Gnome is a
delicious cream cheese sandwich filling
I'm sitting in
On 3/11/07, Quim Gil [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Joachim, it would be great if you could stick to one of the sections
you were responsible of (choose your preferred one) and then go for
writing and reviewing until you get the section done.
The writing process will go faster if we work
On 3/12/07, Joachim [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The writing process will go faster if we work iteratively on the text
itself, rather than a slow process of write - review and nitpick on mailing
lists - write again - nitpick. Basically, we should use the Wikipedia model
and edit directly.
Also,
On 3/12/07, Quim Gil [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
However, you don't need to create any section or page, all this has
been done already. Have you checked http://gnome.jardigrec.eu/ ? :)
Aha! I see them now! Sorry.
I've been finding plone quite hard to get around; didn't realize those were
On 3/6/07, Quim Gil [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 3/6/07, Joachim [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
doesn't it seem odd to be
discussing pages here, when the whole point of collaborative work
environment like a wiki or CMS is that instead of discussing content we
can
just update it?
Theory says you
On 3/6/07, Diego Escalante [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Maybe this page could have a list and explanation of current state of
windows ports of gnome applications, and a link to other free
software applications on win32 pointing to one of those charts that
hang around internet.
As you say, maybe a
On 3/6/07, Quim Gil [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We need to make sure that we don't tell lies at
http://gnome.jardigrec.eu/en/get-started/ms-windows-compatible (GNOME
software is not automatically compatible with Windows) and we need to
explain the rationale behind this Windows compatibility so
Hi!
On 3/6/07, Joachim [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
doesn't it seem odd to be
discussing pages here, when the whole point of collaborative work
environment like a wiki or CMS is that instead of discussing content we can
just update it?
Theory says you are right. In practice if we need to have
I saw the On MS Windows page still needed a writer, so I've volunteered and
written a first draft at:
https://edit.gnome.jardigrec.eu/en/get-started/ms-windows-compatible
The page was built using the content from LGO at
http://live.gnome.org/GnomeMarketing/GnomeOnWindows
I categorized the
Hum, not sure.
A pure list of applications would belong more to GNOME Products. Here
I would explain that thanks to http://www.gimp.org/~tml/gimp/win32/
GNOME applications can be ported and run in Windows, that this is a
good way for the majority of winbdows users to have a first taste of
free
10 matches
Mail list logo
