Quim, I really like the changes you've made to the new
structure plan at
http://live.gnome.org/GnomeWeb/NewWgoStructure
My only concern is how deep down you've placed
Support.
I can see that Support is not worth a top-level link,
because it's only a page of links to the forums and
the mailing
On Wed, 2006-09-08 at 20:36 +0200, Claus Schwarm wrote:
On Wed, 09 Aug 2006 17:01:23 +0200
Quim Gil [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I shouldn't be talking about navigation bars yet, but I'll try. This
structure could bring us to a nav bar like this:
[GNOME logo] Know - Try - Learn - Work -
On Thu, 2006-08-10 at 01:51 -0600, Gezim Hoxha wrote:
On Wed, 2006-09-08 at 11:19 +0100, Joachim Noreiko wrote:
snip
My draft is just that, a draft, and only part of one
at that.
I'm trying to think in terms of paths through the
site. My scenarios are these:
* new to GNOME:
On Thu, 10 Aug 2006 01:47:18 -0600
Gezim Hoxha [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I also don't like Know for some reason. I think maybe because
it sounds like there is some knowledge expected already or I can't
quite pin down my dislike for Know. Get to know or Discover
would work better, I think.
Ok, then. This looks good:
[GNOME logo] Discover - Try - Learn - Create - Join
I think Learn is in fact better, softer than study. You learn from
life. A learning experience sounds positive and exciting. Study is
always a conscious action, you don't study by accident. You can learn
though just
On Thu, 2006-08-10 at 11:27 +0200, Quim Gil wrote:
[GNOME logo] Discover - Try - Learn - Create - Join
I think Learn is in fact better, softer than study.
[snip]
Anyway, I guess what counts here is to have the opinion of native
English speakers.
Hi! John the native English speaker here.
On Thu, 2006-08-10 at 22:07 +1200, John Williams wrote:
I have come to this discussion late and am trawling through the archives
to get some context. Forgive me if I say something silly ;-)
Me too.. .. :)
I really like the idea of using verbs instead of nouns in the
navigational structure.
I still think Learn is better than Ask. Ask is good to reflect
mail/forum/IRC, but shadows documentation. True, from Learn to
'support forums' there is a gap, but I think the meaning is better
covered than using Ask. If we find the 'I want to ask something' use
case is relevant we can have a
On Thu, 2006-08-10 at 13:04 +0200, Quim Gil wrote:
I still think Learn is better than Ask. Ask is good to reflect
mail/forum/IRC, but shadows documentation. True, from Learn to
'support forums' there is a gap, but I think the meaning is better
covered than using Ask.
I think Get Help covers
On Wed, 2006-08-09 at 17:01 +0200, Quim Gil wrote:
[GNOME logo] Know - Try - Learn - Work - Join - Enjoy!
Know = About
Try = Download
Learn = Support
Work = Development
Join = Community
Enjoy! = the Fresh show candy page suggested at
I've finished work on condensing the different drafts,
and following some feedback from Quim, it's on the
wiki:
http://live.gnome.org/GnomeWeb/NewWgoStructure
Note that the top-level section titles are not
necessarily the navigation bar link phrases. I was
thinking in terms of URLs rather than
El dj 10 de 08 del 2006 a les 15:17 +0200, en/na Gergely Nagy va
escriure:
Know = About
Try = Download
If we have to explain even to ourselves what these buzzwords mean, how
do we expect the visitors to understand it? :)
Hey Flanagan :)
I wasn't explaining. Claus had asked for
Hi,
On Thu, 10 Aug 2006 15:55:51 +0100 (BST)
Joachim Noreiko [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've finished work on condensing the different drafts,
and following some feedback from Quim, it's on the
wiki:
http://live.gnome.org/GnomeWeb/NewWgoStructure
We cannot do it like this, IHMO.
The
--- Claus Schwarm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The structure lacks a portal for third-party
developers: This is
GNOME's most important product. The desktop has no
real selling points
unless lots of third-party dev's use the dev.
platform.
Fair enough. Could you add something to the plan for
--- Claus Schwarm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Don't get me wrong. I think most points of the
former proposal are
valid and should be kept in the current wgo
revamp. See
http://live.gnome.org/GnomeWeb/NewWgoStructure ,
I'm asking for
selecting and merging. Why don't you work together
with
On Wed, 9 Aug 2006 11:19:18 +0100 (BST)
Joachim Noreiko [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
None taken :)
Thanks. :-)
I'm trying to think in terms of paths through the
site. My scenarios are these:
* new to GNOME: about, why choose, tour, screenshots
* new users: tour, link to library, link to
16 matches
Mail list logo
