On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 4:33 PM, Jeffrey Kegler
wrote:
> Kind of nice the way that the colors distinguish G1 and L0 rules.
I haven't played with my TextMate / SublimeText highligher for Marpa
in a long time. I agree it's a nice touch. I'm looking at implementing
On Sun, Nov 22, 2015 at 8:39 AM, Paul Bennett
wrote:
> Is there such a document?
>
My specific scenario...
>
> I have a grammar broken up into chunks (corresponding more or less
> with similarity of meaning in the official SGML spec) at
>
>
I don't think I'll ever write a style guide -- I prefer to see what others
come up with.
My order of productions is (I think) similar to the traditional BNF, that
you still see in standards. This tries to be top down, but also to keep
similar things together. Unfortunately the two goals are not
On Sat, Nov 21, 2015 at 3:17 PM, Paul Bennett wrote:
> https://gist.github.com/PWBENNETT/0e860d907fc59554f1ce
Ooh, I don't support comments with that. Working on it.
--
Paul
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"marpa
On Sat, Nov 21, 2015 at 3:42 PM, Paul Bennett wrote:
> https://github.com/PWBENNETT/MarpaX-SGML/blob/master/Marpa.tmLanguage
And here it is in action:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B21ee_I1WzbwNFlVdXE5T2dMQnM/view?usp=sharing
Apologies for the many emails. I'm
On Sat, Nov 21, 2015 at 3:35 PM, Paul Bennett wrote:
>
> Ooh, I don't support comments with that. Working on it.
>
Here, and in its semi-proper location instead of as a gist ...
https://github.com/PWBENNETT/MarpaX-SGML/blob/master/Marpa.tmLanguage
--
Paul
--
You
No need to apologize. Much of the traffic has moved over to IRC, so this
group has gone for a while with basically just announcements and no
discussions.
But your emails are on-topic, and discussions have always been within the
charter of this group.
I am against generating traffic just for the