Re: Emacs marpa-mode

2015-11-21 Thread Paul Bennett
On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 4:33 PM, Jeffrey Kegler wrote: > Kind of nice the way that the colors distinguish G1 and L0 rules. I haven't played with my TextMate / SublimeText highligher for Marpa in a long time. I agree it's a nice touch. I'm looking at implementing

Re: SLIF style guide / best practices?

2015-11-21 Thread Ruslan Shvedov
On Sun, Nov 22, 2015 at 8:39 AM, Paul Bennett wrote: > Is there such a document? > My specific scenario... > > I have a grammar broken up into chunks (corresponding more or less > with similarity of meaning in the official SGML spec) at > >

Re: SLIF style guide / best practices?

2015-11-21 Thread Jeffrey Kegler
I don't think I'll ever write a style guide -- I prefer to see what others come up with. My order of productions is (I think) similar to the traditional BNF, that you still see in standards. This tries to be top down, but also to keep similar things together. Unfortunately the two goals are not

Re: Emacs marpa-mode

2015-11-21 Thread Paul Bennett
On Sat, Nov 21, 2015 at 3:17 PM, Paul Bennett wrote: > https://gist.github.com/PWBENNETT/0e860d907fc59554f1ce Ooh, I don't support comments with that. Working on it. -- Paul -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "marpa

Re: Emacs marpa-mode

2015-11-21 Thread Paul Bennett
On Sat, Nov 21, 2015 at 3:42 PM, Paul Bennett wrote: > https://github.com/PWBENNETT/MarpaX-SGML/blob/master/Marpa.tmLanguage And here it is in action: https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B21ee_I1WzbwNFlVdXE5T2dMQnM/view?usp=sharing Apologies for the many emails. I'm

Re: Emacs marpa-mode

2015-11-21 Thread Paul Bennett
On Sat, Nov 21, 2015 at 3:35 PM, Paul Bennett wrote: > > Ooh, I don't support comments with that. Working on it. > Here, and in its semi-proper location instead of as a gist ... https://github.com/PWBENNETT/MarpaX-SGML/blob/master/Marpa.tmLanguage -- Paul -- You

Re: Emacs marpa-mode

2015-11-21 Thread Jeffrey Kegler
No need to apologize. Much of the traffic has moved over to IRC, so this group has gone for a while with basically just announcements and no discussions. But your emails are on-topic, and discussions have always been within the charter of this group. I am against generating traffic just for the