We use 5.10.1 here, but not 5.10.0.
IMO some of the package minimums specified are slightly too high. I know I did
mention in the past that if Data::Dumper were literally reduced by one point I
wouldn't have to hack up the build every time I make an RPM out of the source.
I think that if the
I probably wouldn't use a grammar/parser for something that is literally just
dot-separated atoms.
-cl
On Oct 3, 2014, at 1430 PT, Ron Savage r...@savage.net.au wrote:
Here's a potential project:
https://publicsuffix.org/
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to
Couldn't you just not use unproductive_ok and inaccessible_ok?
On Sep 26, 2014, at 0930 PT, Ruslan Shvedov ruslan.shve...@gmail.com wrote:
Unproductive and unaccessible rules can be removed from a grammar easily
using code like this:
# cleanup the grammar using Marpa NAIF
my $grammar =
I've posted some things previously on this topic - but in short, you don't
really need to use events to do this. It's possible to do it in a
semi-straightforward fashion without a lot of jumping through hoops (just a
bunch of rules).
Here's some grammar fragments demonstrating what I'm talking
undef from value() could be a semantic user choice, not
a invalid parse tree isn't it?
Le vendredi 15 août 2014 02:31:46 UTC+2, Ron Savage a écrit :
On Friday, 15 August 2014 10:05:58 UTC+10, Christopher Layne wrote:
On Aug 14, 2014, at 1650 PT, Ron Savage r...@savage.net.au wrote
On Aug 14, 2014, at 1523 PT, Ron Savage r...@savage.net.au wrote:
Questions:
Are these for C or Perl or both?
1.) What should be its name? [Probably not doit() ].
I'd like it to be called process().
process() as an additional method also sounds find to me, although it's a bit
On Aug 14, 2014, at 1650 PT, Ron Savage r...@savage.net.au wrote:
On Friday, 15 August 2014 09:15:46 UTC+10, Christopher Layne wrote:
On Aug 14, 2014, at 1523 PT, Ron Savage r...@savage.net.au wrote:
Questions:
Are these for C or Perl or both?
1.) What should be its name
On Jul 29, 2014, at 1013 PT, Jeffrey Kegler jeffreykeg...@jeffreykegler.com
wrote:
At a certain point in their investigation into Lua, a Wikipedian said that it
was a done deal, barring last-minute revelations that Lua has some sort of a
sordid past. The Kollos investigation of Lua is
beyond where I'd gone and showed me
that I could and should improve on Marpa's original interface (the NAIF).
-- jeffrey
On 06/19/2014 11:42 AM, Christopher Layne wrote:
If you ignore the null rule it'll blow your mind less if you think about it
as:
A ::= B | 'hello!'
A ::=
There's
If your audience is smart you can also use an alternative way of demonstrating
the value of grammars and parsing by taking a very simple parsing example (one
that requires state management if implemented literally) and showing a slide
before anything else that has a literal non-grammar based
Nope because I want the whitespace. In non quoted cases I don't.
On May 20, 2014, at 15:32, Ron Savage r...@savage.net.au wrote:
Was this meant to be attached to your previous article?
More below.
I'm confused by these 2 lines:
word_qd ~ [^] | whitespace | escape []
11 matches
Mail list logo
