aneous text when replying to a message.
> ==
>
>
> Hi Gulf Mann
>
> With all respect it should just be Assange. Why is it when a great idea
> emerges someone from the Left always, and I mean always, has to try an
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
You might have mentioned Obama, too. Notwithstanding, the prize still has
cachet and
Ellsberg and Assange wherein he mentions the contributions of
> Russo and Manning, who I likewise think should be acknowledged. ~Gulf Mann
>
> Gulf Mann wrote
>
> We could make some deft defensive moves, too, by going on the offense
> and starting a campaign to awa
week ago. God bless the Internet! ~Gulf Mann
On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 9:58 PM, Gulf Mann wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 3:48 PM, Jay Moore wrote:
>
>> ==
>> Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text wh
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
All the more reason to put Ellsberg/Russo and Assange/Manning up for a
shared Nobel
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 3:48 PM, Jay Moore wrote:
> ===
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
Goldberg is squeezing his 15 minutes of fame. He's prolly going to write a
string of
:
> ==
> Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
> ==
>
>
> Gulf Mann wrote:
>
> >Haunting archeological photos worth a look, but the short intros >to each
>
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
Ain't it nice when reviewers actually "get it"! The review, however, left me
wonderi
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
If the kid only knew the afterlife of his brief encounter with Lewis...he's
become a
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 4:01 PM, Anthony Boynton
wrote:
> =
11 matches
Mail list logo