e -
From: "Lüko Willms"
To: "David Schanoes"
Sent: Tuesday, September 29, 2009 1:55 AM
Subject: Re: [Marxism]Bonapartism [Re: Chavez was right [was: RE: Chávez and
Holocaust indifference]]
Exactly. You are deliberately throwing out the recognition of the
economic,
ma
S. Artesian (sartes...@earthlink.net) wrote on 2009-09-28 at 19:03:08 in
about Re: [Marxism]Bonapartism [Re: Chavez was right [was: RE: Chávez and
Holocaust indifference]]:
>
>
> Peoples' tribune to Imperator-- the populist backing for authoritarianism is
> not a new, nor i
economic,
material conditions that spawn the populism and the Bonaparte, and convert
the former into camp followers of the latter.
- Original Message -
From: "Nestor Gorojovsky"
To: "David Schanoes"
Sent: Monday, September 28, 2009 6:08 PM
Subject: Re: [Marxism]
No, S. Artesian. You are twisting my argument.
Isn´t it a pity, from a man who can taste a "canard á l´orange"
S. Artesian escribió:
> Oh, I see, to be effective, to sternly develop the means of production, the
> vaguely social Bonaparte has to turn himself/herself into an Imperator, into
> a C
