==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
I've posted my rebuttal on my blog : http://felisniger.blogspot.com/
If you don't
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
At 12:45 17/12/10 -0500, Louis Proyect wrote:
The thread on NPA, Islamophobia,
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
As one of the ballistics, I have no intention of making any additional
comments on
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
At 17:24 17/12/10 -0500, Louis Proyect wrote:
On 12/17/10 4:41 PM, Jeff wrote:
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
Isn't this a positive sign of resistance along with the UK student
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
that's fine, although I can't recall detecting any controversy here on this
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
The thread on Yugoslavia is finished. For those who are interested
in reading past
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
Here's what I get when I follow the links and try to search:
Not Found
The
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
huh. i'll check with Hans on that one.
but i think you misunderstood Lou. you
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
On 10/21/10 10:00 PM, Brian Dick wrote:
I'm assuming that your comment about the
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
Dear Louis,
I recently added myself to this list serve because I am a Marxist. I
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
On 9/21/10 5:50 PM, Grover Furr-FM wrote:
I can't find any mention of such a
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
Yeah I know, people have been suspended or kicked outta here for way less
than his
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
I unsubbed Doctor Kowalski. Apparently he didn't understand that the
list was not
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
We really don't need a new round of acrimony over Polanski. Just about
every point
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
The crowd at the Conrad Hilton was not a coherent force. Some, I'm
sure, were
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
This, except for Tod Cod's remarks, sounds like armchair monday
quarterbacking
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
I can't help it if clever people want to channel a subconscious
fascism into my
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
S. Artesian wrote:
This knee-jerk response, recoiling in horror to any show of
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
Right, I do not understand the importance of having Ted Kennedy or John
Lindsay on
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
S. Artesian wrote:
5) Finally, there's no shortage of outlets, media access for
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
Mark Lause wrote:
A single demonstration is a complex thing with many
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
Tom Cod wrote:
Jerry Rubin was a narcissistic asshole, way worse than even
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
Rubin had the reputation as having a good sense of humor. He didn't. Stew
Alpert
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
I quite agree.
On 7/3/10 7:27 PM, Carrol Cox wrote:
... Abbie Hoffman is another
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
Well, I have one post left, so I ask for indulgence for a last comment. I
just
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
Louis, you've been quite gentle when it comes to my own transgressions
of Marxmail
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
dan wrote:
However, I do feel Mikhail Rodsky, from Toronto, has done no real harm.
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
Dan Koechlin has lost his posting privileges until June 30. He has
posted 13 times
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
On Mon, 31 May 2010 20:08:49 -0400
Louis Proyect l...@panix.com wrote:
Dan
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
Louis Proyect wrote:
Tom Cod loses his posting privileges for a month. Tom, mark
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
I'm not sure about Trotsky's cat, though. The Soviets have solid evidence
that
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
Ah, you mean Trotsky was keeping a cat on the side, so to speak. That's
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
On 22.04.10 00:35, Dan wrote:
snip
In Sate and Revolution, Lenin is engaged in
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
On 4/21/2010 3:37 PM, Dan wrote:
[...]
According to Marx, censorship is inherently
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
Dan wrote:
Shawn had his reservations about the way the debate on climate change
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
This is my 5th post, and so I must use it wisely. 2nd bottle of côtes
de Provence
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
Eric pointed out that this isn't a party, so I guess it falls to me
to point out
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
I suggest Louis to add this quote from Badiou to the Moderation Principles note
of
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
On Apr 21, 2010, at 9:04 PM, Mehmet Cagatay wrote:
I suggest Louis to add this
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
Shawn Redden wrote:
Did Morales mention carbon? It wasn't said in the article.
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
FWIW-- and I know that Shawn can re-up after a cooling off period, having
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
There is a five post a day limit.
Also, I am very concerned that comrades don't
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
No Stalin/Trotsky debates here. Please. Or else.
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
Okay, this thread involving Dogan, the CPUSA has hit a brick wall. I
understand
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
Let's drop this thread, including the reference to Dogan's name in the
subject
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
At 10:50 27/12/09 -0500, Louis Proyect wrote:
Let's drop this thread,
Well
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
2009/12/27 Jeff meis...@xs4all.nl
For instance, one argument was over whether the
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
In a message dated 12/27/2009 12:55:22 P.M. Eastern Standard Time,
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
Dear Comrade,
I have not implied anything like that.
As I said I am not able to go
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
Comrades are going to have to control their one and two line snarky
posts to the
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
I am replying to the subject line which you suggested that it should be
dropped
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
Mr Bhandari had shown himself to be an apologist and defender of
American
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
L.P. wrote:
It rather presents itself
as the behavior of an intellectually
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
The India v. Pakistan rivalry, with its concomitant ethnic
nationalism, fosters
Greg Butler has been unsubbed.
YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
Send list submissions to: Marxism@lists.econ.utah.edu
Set your options at:
http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com
Thank you! we don't need to have this become another apst.
Date: Sun, 23 Aug 2009 14:48:53 -0400
From: l...@panix.com
Subject: [Marxism] Moderator's note
To: t...@hotmail.com
Greg Butler has been unsubbed.
YOU MUST clip all extraneous
Whatsa apst, please?
- Bill
Tom Cod wrote:
Thank you! we don't need to have this become another apst.
Date: Sun, 23 Aug 2009 14:48:53 -0400
From: l...@panix.com
Subject: [Marxism] Moderator's note
To: t...@hotmail.com
Greg Butler has been unsubbed
Bill Quimby wrote:
Whatsa apst, please?
alt.politics.socialism.trotsky, a newsgroup for the criminally insane
that David Walters and Einde O'Callaghan still inexplicably post to. It
has daily doses of anti-Semitism, conspiracy mongering, xenophobia, etc.
It is like drinking out of a
Lou wrote:
alt.politics.socialism.trotsky, a newsgroup for the criminally insane
I'd been on that usenet group for a few years -as Jasper- before more
recently joining MarxmailI very much agree with this description of it,
despite some incredibly useful stuff that do mix with its sense of
Baba Aye wrote:
This I suggest with the view of assuaging any latent view of the
implementation of these being an arbitrary dictatorship of the moderator.
This is an excellent idea. I am finally getting ready to build a new
website for Marxmail and will incorporate this.
On Sun, 2009-08-16 at 11:52 +1000, Tom O'Lincoln wrote:
Re Ian's question about the need to debate the USSR but avoid
Stalin-Trotsky flames, and where the boundary is. I've debated much of this
here over the years and never been un-subbed or even warned. I suggest the
test is whether you
--
From: Louis Proyect l...@panix.com
Sent: Thursday, August 13, 2009 6:20 PM
To: i...@ianpace.com
Subject: [Marxism] Moderator's note
I have lifted all the suspensions of subscribers from the other week
during the flame war/debate over the Red Army and rape. If I missed
anybody (you
Ian Pace wrote:
I'm very glad the suspensions have been lifted. On the wider issues, I can't
really see how a Marxism discussion group could feasibly avoid all
discussion of the Soviet Union, but do understand that measures need to be
taken to avoid Trotskyist/Stalinist flame wars.
who
Dogan Gocmen wrote:
Jscotlive loses his posting privileges until September 1.
I protest emphatically as he has the right to defend against dishonest
claims and falsifications.
The debate was coming to its end any way. The post by Sartesian has provoked
these responses.
He simply could have
1. A number of comrades are overposting. The limit is 5 posts per day.
Please keep track.
2. Comrades are beginning to become abusive. This is the main reason
that I try to steer conversations away from anything having to do with
the USSR.
3. I urge you to write one last thing on the Red
Provided I'm not provoked, this is my last word
George Anthony
YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
Send list submissions to: Marxism@lists.econ.utah.edu
Set your options at:
This discussion began with the assertion that the Soviets
distinguished between Germans and the Nazi state. I objected to this
as a fairy tale, mentioning in particular the mass rape of what was
estimated as two million German females of all ages by elements of the
Red Army.
In response, we were
Among all the military historians and war buffs fighting old battles, where o
where is there a feminist socialist voice in this discussion?
=
Richard Levins
YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
Greg McDonald wrote:
Richard Levins wrote:
After perusing the discussion on rape, I
would add marxfail.
I do hope 4chan memes aren't starting to enter this list.
http://images.google.com/images?q=fail
YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when
70 matches
Mail list logo
