Re: [Marxism] Liberal disgust with Obama

== Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message. == And then there's Paul Krugman (

Re: [Marxism] Liberal disgust with Obama

== Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message. == S. Artesian writes: No personal offense intended, but who gives a rat's ass about

Re: [Marxism] Liberal disgust with Obama

== Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message. == You know what the most sad and pathetic part of all this is? The liberals are

Re: [Marxism] Liberal disgust with Obama

== Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message. == Brian Latour: You know what the most sad and pathetic part of all this is?

Re: [Marxism] Liberal disgust with Obama

== Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message. == Really? I've heard that same tired talk about liberalism being a significant

Re: [Marxism] Liberal disgust with Obama

== Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message. == S. Artesian: It's not the disaffection with liberals that will move workers away

Re: [Marxism] Liberal disgust with Obama

== Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message. == Huffington, Krugman and others are important as bellwethers. Voters for Obushma

Re: [Marxism] Liberal disgust with Obama

== Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message. == Ah... now I understand. All those good things-- so like when Obama actually

Re: [Marxism] Liberal disgust with Obama

== Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message. == S. Artesian: I was thinking that maybe the place to start was actually some

Re: [Marxism] Liberal disgust with Obama

== Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message. == Eli wrote-- So according to your theory immigrant workers have no interest in