Jim replies...
>In message <004f01be96b1$df9def80$7ae5a3c3@malecki>, Bob Malecki
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
>
>>Empirical bullshit Jim.
>
>Yeah, sorry about that, I didn't mean to talk about what is really
>happening, when it is so much more revolutionary to substitute what one
>thinks ought t
At 09:19 05/05/99 +, you wrote:
>Chris writes:
>
>>The agenda of "humanitarian imperialism" is an agenda of bourgeois
>>democratic rights and it has a dual character: partly progressive and
>>partly reactionary.
>
>In what way progressive?
>
>Russ
It is for example progressive if it strives t
At 12:24 05/05/99 -0400, you wrote:
>http://www.independent.co.uk/stories/B0405918.html
>
>The Independent Online
>
>May 4, 1999
>
>US admits Sudan bombing mistake
A valuable report and I rejoice at it. It is one of the issues that
constrains the would be hegemons of the new global government.
In message <004f01be96b1$df9def80$7ae5a3c3@malecki>, Bob Malecki
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
>Empirical bullshit Jim.
Yeah, sorry about that, I didn't mean to talk about what is really
happening, when it is so much more revolutionary to substitute what one
thinks ought to be happening.
--
Jim he
http://www.independent.co.uk/stories/B0405918.html
The Independent Online
May 4, 1999
US admits Sudan bombing mistake
By Andrew Marshall in Washington
In an admission that last year's missile attack on a factory in Sudan was
a mistake, the US has cleared the man who owned the plant of any li
> >The Times
> >May 4 1999
> >
> >Roger Boyes Inside Germany
> >
> >'Chancellor of war' faces tide of dissent
> >The tide of German opinion is shifting rapidly
> >against the Nato war in Yugoslavia. Popular
> >opponents have found a voice in the form of Oskar
> >Lafontaine, the former Finance Mi
A forward for Big Daddy.
CB
***
|||
| /\ |
|| |__
G'day Tom,
You speculate:
>Isn't it about time for the next sheep shearing on Wall Street or will
>it wait until after the Yugoslavian Affair is over. Or are we going to
>see a little sheep dip before the shearing?
If Kenichi Ohmae is right (and I've always suspected it), a significant
chunk o
Chris writes:
>The agenda of "humanitarian imperialism" is an agenda of bourgeois
>democratic rights and it has a dual character: partly progressive and
>partly reactionary.
In what way progressive?
Russ
--- from list [EMAIL PROTECTED] ---
