>Hugh Replies!
> Right. Note that the Serb regime represents on the one hand an oppressed
> nation being attacked by imperialism (like Iraq) and on the other an
> oppressor nation with a clear record of fascist Master Race (in this case
> Greater Serb) claims over and against other nations. The o
Jim,
Filled in the empty spaces..
Bob
Date: Thu, 20 May 1999 16:39:49 +0200
From: "Bob Malecki" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: SV: M-TH: Re: paragraph on Balkans
Jim replies to Dave!
>
> Without wanting to sound too sectarian there were a few points in the
> repy which don't seem to make much
G'day Thaxists,
Anyone know exactly where I got this Karlism? I've lost the cite and my
books are at home.
"... the *practice* of philosophy is itself *theoretical.* It is
the *critique* that measures the individual existence by the
essence, the particular reality by the Idea."
Ta.
Rob.
The Crisis in Yugoslavia and its Relationship to Global Fascism
27 April 1999
Richard K. Moore
http://cyberjournal.org
Among the lies and hypocrisies which characterize media reportage on NATO's
aggression aga
G'day Dave,
A quibble ...
You write:
>When NATO and imperialism are defeated or out of
>the Balkans, we can call for the implementation of self-determination
>for Kosovo. It may be that the result will be a Kosovar Socialist
>Republic in a Balkan Federation which will include Serbia, Croatia
Dave B writes in reply to John W in Manchester:
>In response to John;
>1. Dual defensism? Defense against imperialism takes priority. But
>Kosovars should defend themselves also against any Serb oppression.
Right. Note that the Serb regime represents on the one hand an oppressed
nation being at
John Walker wrote:
Just a BRIEF reply to Dave's reply to Rob.
Without wanting to sound too sectarian there were a few points in the
repy which don't seem to make much sense to me. The arguement appears
to be that we should defend Yugoslavia as well as supporting the
right of Kosovars to defen