>Dear Rob,
>
>> Where I am with Simon is the sensibility that we're not at the planning
>> stage until lots'n'lots of people are engaged. And then they'll be part
>of
>> the planning, too, eh? I've never worn that 'saviours waving the
>programme
>> at the masses' stuff. Don't reckon it gets you
Going back to the original article Meszaros says:
> freedom is not something that simply falls out of the sky and hits us,
> and then everything is all right. It is a very complex social
> transformation, and at the same time involves a certain conception of
> humanity and its conditions of existe
Simon,
I was fascinated to read your comment:
> Please, not imperialism. Capitalism.
Well, I had no idea that there were socialists of any sort who
actually opposed the word Imperialism entirely. It is hardly a
Leninist term as the the nice Mr. Hobson was a staunch Liberal.
Unless you are acc
Good quote.
I am copying it to marxism-thaxis.
Chris Burford
London
At 14:10 25/11/99 -0500, you wrote:
>Stephen Jay Gould writes in "Nurturing Nature," _An Urchin in the Storm:
>Essays about Books and Ideas_ (NY: Norton, 1987):
>
>* ..._Not in Our Genes_ [by R.C. Lewontine, Steven Ros
