At 12:07 13/12/99 GMT, John Walker wrote:
>Here are a few more quotes from Marx OWN writings on dialectics
>existing in nature:
Bravo!!
If you are in Manchester have you been able to inspect in the rare books
section of the John Rylands University Library for the 2000 page documents
of the c
At 09:09 13/12/99 GMT, John Walker wrote:
>Chris actually wrote that:
>> One of the problems of a Gramscian concept of revolutionary change in a
>> developed capitalist society it what individual changes are significant,
>> however small.
>
>If Mohammad Ali was voted Sports personality of the ce
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, J.WALKER
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
>To ask, 'What is the relevance of dialectical materialism to the class
>struggle?' demonstrates the very problem. Their commitment to the
>class struggle is not in doubt but it misses entirely the whole point
>of Marxism's solut
>>> Lew <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 12/10/99 05:29PM >>>
Of course they produced a lot of work together. But it would take a very
extreme contortion to see them as always speaking with one voice. They
were two separate human beings with their own strengths and weaknesses,
and different interests.
(
>>> Rob Schaap <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 12/13/99 12:24PM
Funny thing is, over on LBO, I'm pretty well locked in as hopeless defender
of crass old-fashioned materialism (at least I think this is the case -
they can be pretty hard to follow over there)
Charles: Proud to have another v
Rob,
_Anti-Duhring_ is very good to read.
>>> Rob Schaap <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 12/13/99 12:24PM >>>
G'day Thaxists,
John has prodded me back to *Anti-Duhring* - and what a good read it is,
too (I've always maintained that, whilst Marx could deliver himself of
some world-historic passages, Engels
G'day Thaxists,
John has prodded me back to *Anti-Duhring* - and what a good read it is,
too (I've always maintained that, whilst Marx could deliver himself of
some world-historic passages, Engels was the better read over any
distance). Anyway, I reckon a would-be historical materialist, such a
The following is more demonstration of dialectics as process of natural history :
Reason
and Revolt: Marxism and Science by Alan Woods and Ted Grant online @
http://easyweb.easynet.co.uk/~zac/maindex.htm
CB
(
>>> Rob Schaap <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 12/13/99 09:00AM >>>
You've c
Hi again,
IMO comrades - who are outraged at the economic system they find
themselves in; who are morally offended by the massive poverty which
sits unpleasantly next to the exclusivity of the great wealth of
society - are drawn to Marxism as one amongst a number of possible
solutions to this sta
Good one , John,
You have found even more examples than we did last time,directly from Marx, directly
of Marx expressing the opinion that dialectics has validity not only in human history
but in natural history.
Maybe Marx was wrong, but those who are arguing the other side should say that th
I'd like to be able to follow Russian scene, a little closer, esp. about the
CPRF's follies as evidenced below. Any periodicals or e-mail lists come to
mind?
Michael Pugliese
==
RUSSIAN COMMUNIST WORKERS PARTY:
The following dia
You've convinced me, John!
I'm off to buy up big on E-Bay and Amazon - that should keep me in lager
and tabs whilst I observe the natural transformation of capitalism into its
one and only immanent other from my verandah.
Bugger decades of penury in the reading room, eh?
Cheers,
Rob.
>Hi,
>
>>
Well, mebbe you're not as old as I am, John, but ten years ago the term
'great white hope' was still freely and widely used to describe anyone with
a remote chance of reclaiming the title for whitedom. And twenty-five
years ago, Ali rarely missing an opportunity to talk into all those mikes
about
Hi,
>From what I've read it I think that Marx just presumes that the
dialective pervades both the physical natural world and its subset the
human social world. He had read the ancient writers as we know from
his dissertation (a work I haven't read, yet) and they certainly
thought that the dialect
Chris actually wrote that:
> One of the problems of a Gramscian concept of revolutionary change in a
> developed capitalist society it what individual changes are significant,
> however small.
If Mohammad Ali was voted Sports personality of the century is really
such a revolutionary change odd
15 matches
Mail list logo
