Ralph,
1.You should be distrustful of this biosemiotics business. In essence,
it's just a new twist on the kind of Neo-Kantian Ideas, Western and Russian,
that Lenin (1908) warned us about in Materialism and Empirio-Criticism.
2. I don't know just how much you want to know about it so I'll
Wow! Thanks for the synopsis. I don't understand how biosemiotics is
Neo-Kantian, though. If you are referring to Soviet philosopher David
Dubrovsky, I'd appreciate some expansion on this topic as well.
Do you know whether Whitehead had a social theory? The lack of social
theory in the bios
There's a fundamental miscommunication gong on here. But first . . .
At 07:02 PM 3/11/2005 +, redtwister666 wrote:
Facilitating Organization Change: Lessons from Complexity Science
by Edwin E. Olson, Glenda H. Eoyang, Richard Beckhard, Peter Vaill.
Notice the E. O. Wilson of sociobiology fame
I hesitate to forward this, because in the 60s and 70s, when we were
child-rebels thinking of ourselves as 'revolutionaries' but having
no strategy to take state power and the productive forces, we were
disrupted, became mutually suspicious within organizations and
between organizations. This, lea
- Original Message -
From: "Ralph Dumain" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, March 12, 2005 4:50 PM
Subject: Re: [Marxism-Thaxis] Van Heijenoort's critique of Engels
> Wow! Thanks for the synopsis. I don't understand how biosemiotics is
> Neo-Kantian, thou
LEARNING FROM CHINA
Why the Western Economic Model Will not Work for the World
www.earth-policy.org/Updates/2005/Update46.htm
Lester R. Brown
Could the American dream in China become a nightmare for the world? For
China's 1.3 billion people, the American dream is fast becoming the
Chinese dream.
