Well, if you got my point (2), the rest shouldn't be so mysterious. ME
openly admit they're not going to tackle directly either the natural
sciences as an intellectual enterprise or their objects of study (laws of
nature). At the same time they admit that's part of the picture, though
they
I think these passages by Oudeyis 5/29 nicely capture some of the points we
have been discussing. Below them I include some passages from the Ilyenkov
book he refers to.
on 5/29 Oudeyis said:
... there is no doubt that nature must also include that
which is beyond the observed and acted upon
I do not understand the meaning of the three quotes from Ilyenkov.
At 02:03 PM 5/30/2005 -0700, Steve Gabosch wrote:
...
from my 1977 Progress edition, which I was lucky to get through the
internet last year. I corrected a couple scanning errors from the MIA version.
Copied
