Hudson is a babbler. Why not just say it in about 20 words? The
Greenspan Bubble is finally coming undone and no one really knows what
to do about it.
CJ
___
Marxism-Thaxis mailing list
Marxism-Thaxis@lists.econ.utah.edu
To change your options or
That seems like such a weak way to attack the position--personal inconsistency.
Is it really even a current debate? In the analytic tradition, after
Lakatos and Feyerabend, Popper--on what is a science and how it
works--is thoroughly demolished.
In the non-philosophical 'mainstream', Marxism is
On Wed, 17 Sep 2008 08:12:48 +0900 CeJ [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
That seems like such a weak way to attack the position--personal
inconsistency.
Is it really even a current debate? In the analytic tradition,
after
Lakatos and Feyerabend, Popper--on what is a science and how it
Remember that classical Marxism always insisted
that it was a science.
So did Mary Baker Eddy's Christian Science. So did a lot of things
trying to get people to follow them. So did a lot of people or fields
trying to get people to believe that they were espousing a TRUTH.
Most likely 'classical
Popper of course argued those things too, but he believed
that it was Marxism's ability at convincing people that it
was a genuine science that helped persuade people to
go along with it.
Perhaps this helps explain his somewhat negative relationship with the
contemporaneous logical positivists?
