Re: [Marxism-Thaxis] Paul Cockshott on Leonid Kantorovich and the socialist calculation debate

2009-06-06 Thread CeJ
>>You have a very EXPANSIVE view of what science is. That's good because then you don't have to waste a lot of time arguing what science is and is not. I'm more of the Lakatos and Feyerabend modes of thinking about the matter. << Actually now that I think about that, one, I seemed to have slipped

Re: [Marxism-Thaxis] Paul Cockshott on Leonid Kantorovich and the socialist calculation debate

2009-06-06 Thread CeJ
>>CB: Not to be cute, but isn't economics the science of supply and distribution of goods ?<< I'm wondering now how to capture 'services' in my use of the term 'logistics', since so much seems to be dependent on them. I guess logistics is supposed to be the management of such economies. But then a