Afterthought: "something external to whomever does the theorizing." Aren't
you missing out on the notion that Hegel deems philosophy as scientific,
i.e. systematic, reproducible, and detachable from the empirical
knower? Wasn't this the crux of his quarrel with Schlegel? The unity of
subject
At 10:28 AM 3/9/2005 -0800, andie nachgeborenen wrote:
--- Ralph Dumain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I can't speak to THE DIALECTICAL BIOLOGIST, as I
> haven't read it, though it
> is gathering dust somewhere. The Dialectics of
> Biology group produced a
> couple of interesting books, mostly witho
--- Ralph Dumain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I can't speak to THE DIALECTICAL BIOLOGIST, as I
> haven't read it, though it
> is gathering dust somewhere. The Dialectics of
> Biology group produced a
> couple of interesting books, mostly without mumbo
> jumbo, as I recall. I
> assume you mea
I can't speak to THE DIALECTICAL BIOLOGIST, as I haven't read it, though it
is gathering dust somewhere. The Dialectics of Biology group produced a
couple of interesting books, mostly without mumbo jumbo, as I recall. I
assume you meant 100% not 10% external.
As for dialectics and emergence,
