Shane Mage
Waistline2 at aol.com wrote:
>
> Attacking the "ultra right" is nothing more than a clever way of
> demanding
> unconditional support of the Obama administration
Exactly.
^
CB: A point upon which sec
II.
How is the new logic against the poor - destitute proletarians, being
expressed?
The health Care debates are instructive. Over and over older workers
rallying against a single payer system - on Medicare, are asked why they oppose
single payer. "I do not want government control over
On Aug 13, 2009, at 12:59 PM, waistli...@aol.com wrote:
>
> Attacking the "ultra right" is nothing more than a clever way of
> demanding
> unconditional support of the Obama administration
Exactly.
Shane Mage
> This cosmos did none of gods or men make, but it
> always was and is and shall be:
Well, at a very quick reading, I got a general idea of the
correlation of forces delineated by Waistline, though I will have to
study this again. But I don't understand how attacking the right =
unconditional support for Obama.
At 01:51 PM 8/13/2009, c b wrote:
>Shane Mage
>
>--
> Attacking the "ultra right" is nothing more than a clever way of
> demanding unconditional support of the Obama administration
Exactly.
^
CB: A point upon which sectarians/ultra-lefts, whether Stalinist or
Trotskyist, can agree.
Comment
1). It was in fact the Clinton Administrati
>>
>>
>> Attacking the "ultra right" is nothing more than a clever way of
>> demanding
>> unconditional support of the Obama administration
>
> Exactly.
>
> ^
> CB: A point upon which sectarians/ultra-lefts, whether Stalinist or
> Trotskyist, can agree.
A record--four(!) stupid insults in o
In a message dated 8/13/2009 1:51:41 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
cb31...@gmail.com writes:
CB: A point upon which sectarians/ultra-lefts, whether Stalinist or
Trotskyist, can agree.
Comment
Name calling is fine.
What the proletarian fighters coming to the fore need is understanding and
