[Marxism-Thaxis] The Evolution of Culture

2010-04-05 Thread c b
CeJ jannuzi Why did we need dogs to develop gesturing. We could gesture to people. But drove forward that development? There is a really cute program on TV here in Japan that shows the adventures of a chimpanzee (who is very socialized to humans) who is paired up with a bull dog. The two animals

Re: [Marxism-Thaxis] The Evolution of Culture

2010-04-05 Thread c b
Carrol Cox wrote: This was a fascinating post, I learned a lot from it. But it seems to me the understandings of language and change it describes could be expressed in other terms than the metaphor of evolution. Natural selection, applied to human history, including the history of

[Marxism-Thaxis] The Evolution of Culture

2010-04-05 Thread CeJ
CB: You're the linguist. But to me, the essence of language is symbolling. Using something to represent something that it is not. The co-operation of dogs and humans was most likely very adaptive for dogs. I bet their population is a lot bigger than that of wolves , now. But the theory about

Re: [Marxism-Thaxis] The Evolution of Culture

2010-04-02 Thread Carrol Cox
This was a fascinating post, I learned a lot from it. But it seems to me the understandings of language and change it describes could be expressed in other terms than the metaphor of evolution. Natural selection, applied to human history, including the history of language, seems to caught up in

Re: [Marxism-Thaxis] The Evolution of Culture

2010-04-02 Thread CeJ
Languages (that is, communities of speakers who use a language or a form of it in communication) in their current state of play (parole, collective performance) have to balance competing but not negating, for want of a better word, 'principles' of 'redundancy' and 'efficiency'. Without redundancy,

[Marxism-Thaxis] The Evolution of Culture

2010-03-31 Thread CeJ
One interesting theory is about what separates our line of development from other homonids--co-evolution with another highly intelligent, highly social animal--dogs. This might lead us down other areas of inquiry, such as , if human language first devloped as gesture, did it develop with canines ,

Re: [Marxism-Thaxis] The Evolution of Culture

2010-03-31 Thread c b
Why did we need dogs to develop gesturing. We could gesture to people. On 3/31/10, CeJ jann...@gmail.com wrote: One interesting theory is about what separates our line of development from other homonids--co-evolution with another highly intelligent, highly social animal--dogs. This might lead

Re: [Marxism-Thaxis] The Evolution of Culture

2010-03-31 Thread CeJ
Why did we need dogs to develop gesturing. We could gesture to people. But drove forward that development? There is a really cute program on TV here in Japan that shows the adventures of a chimpanzee (who is very socialized to humans) who is paired up with a bull dog. The two animals do

[Marxism-Thaxis] The Evolution of Culture

2010-03-29 Thread c b
http://www.infoplease.com/ce6/society/A0858699.html Encyclopedia—human evolution The Evolution of Culture Among hominids, a parallel evolutionary process involving increased intelligence and cultural complexity is apparent in the material record. Evidence of greater behavioral flexibility and